On Dec 10, 5:39 am, gangesmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i've had this strange idea of using the exception's traceback (which
> holds the stack frame) to enable functional continuations, meaning,
> raise some special exception which will be caught by a reactor/
> scheduler/framework, which cou
On Dec 10, 2:39 am, gangesmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i've had this strange idea of using the exception's traceback (which
> holds the stack frame) to enable functional continuations, meaning,
> raise some special exception which will be caught by a reactor/
> scheduler/framework, which cou
gangesmaster a écrit :
> i've had this strange idea of using the exception's traceback (which
> holds the stack frame) to enable functional continuations, meaning,
> raise some special exception which will be caught by a reactor/
> scheduler/framework, which could later revive it by restoring the
>
i've had this strange idea of using the exception's traceback (which
holds the stack frame) to enable functional continuations, meaning,
raise some special exception which will be caught by a reactor/
scheduler/framework, which could later revive it by restoring the
frame.
i'm thinking of using th
