On Saturday 23 April 2005 02:43 am, Mage wrote:
> Scott David Daniels wrote:
> > See, the body of your anonymous function just looks for "the current
> > value of n" when it is _invoked_, not when it is _defined_.
>
> The "lambda functions" was an unclear part of the tutorial I read.
> Should I us
On 22 Apr 2005 20:45:55 -0700, "El Pitonero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bengt Richter wrote:
>> I still don't know what you are asking for, but here is a toy,
>> ...
>> But why not spend some time with the tutorials, so have a few more
>cards in your deck
>> before you try to play for real? ;-)
>
Mage wrote:
Scott David Daniels wrote:
See, the body of your anonymous function just looks for "the current
value of n" when it is _invoked_, not when it is _defined_.
The "lambda functions" was an unclear part of the tutorial I read.
Should I use them? Are they pythonic?
As far I see they are good
Mage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:mailman.2339.1114242211.1799.python-
> The "lambda functions" was an unclear part of the tutorial I read.
> Should I use them? Are they pythonic?
> As far I see they are good only for type less a bit.
And to obfusicate code. lambda is evil, do not play with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i wonder if there is an automatic way to make that without calling a
function.
You mean without _explicitely_ calling a function.
May I inquire why you need to write f instead of f(x)?
an automatic way that depends on changing the value of x. as each time
x=something used t
Scott David Daniels wrote:
>
>
> See, the body of your anonymous function just looks for "the current
> value of n" when it is _invoked_, not when it is _defined_.
The "lambda functions" was an unclear part of the tutorial I read.
Should I use them? Are they pythonic?
As far I see they are good o
On 22 Apr 2005 15:18:53 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Thanx for your replies.
>
>I'm looking for array of functions.
>Something like a=[ sin(x) , cos(x) ]
>
x=0.0
a
>[0, 1]
x=1.0
a
>...
>
>of course it can be made by
def cratearray(x):
>...
>...
Thanx.
It just popped in my mind.
in 3d programming there are transformation matrices like
a=[[cos(x),sin(x),0],[-sin(x),cos(x),0],[0,0,1]]
it is a 3x3 matrix. never changes during program.
it can be defined like
>>> def transmat(x):
... dummy=[[0,0,0],[0,0,0],[0,0,0]]
... d
't' is not defined
> >>>
>
> or
>
> >>> a=[ lambda t: t**n for n in range(4) ]
> >>> t=2
> >>> a
> [ at 0x403dcc6c>, at 0x403dcca4>,
> at 0x403dccdc>, at 0x403dcd14>]
> >>> t=3
> >>> a
> [
Bengt Richter wrote:
> I still don't know what you are asking for, but here is a toy,
> ...
> But why not spend some time with the tutorials, so have a few more
cards in your deck
> before you try to play for real? ;-)
Communication problem.
All he wanted is automatic evaluation a la spreadsheet
ted?
If you want an *answer*, you need to ask a *question*.
Perhaps you don't know how to call such functions? E.g.:
a=[ lambda t: t**n for n in range(4) ]
>>> a[2](3)
27
If you want to see *names* for the functions, you have two
choices: either used named functions,
def un
On Friday 22 April 2005 06:44 pm, Scott David Daniels wrote:
> Terry Hancock wrote:
> > On Friday 22 April 2005 05:18 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps you don't know how to call such functions? E.g.:
> > a=[ lambda t: t**n for n in range(4) ]
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
