Re: YouTube showing repr() of a tuple

Paul Boddie wrote: > On 2 Apr, 16:19, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Both fixed by the time I managed to follow the links. > > There wasn't much to see, and putting apostrophes into the input > didn't seem to cause "proper" repr() behaviour. So I suspect that the > Python resemblance w

Re: YouTube showing repr() of a tuple

On 2 Apr, 16:19, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Both fixed by the time I managed to follow the links. There wasn't much to see, and putting apostrophes into the input didn't seem to cause "proper" repr() behaviour. So I suspect that the Python resemblance was coincidental. Paul --

Re: YouTube showing repr() of a tuple

Leif K-Brooks wrote: > Leif K-Brooks wrote: >> Thought this might amuse some of you: >> >> > > Better example: > > Both fixed by the time I managed to follow the links.

Re: YouTube showing repr() of a tuple

Leif K-Brooks wrote: > Thought this might amuse some of you: > > Better example: -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: YouTube showing repr() of a tuple

> Thought this might amuse some of you: > > > > I'd heard that YouTube uses Python, but it's fun to see proof of that, > even if it comes in the form of a minor bug. But their web frontend is (probably) in php: http://youtube.com/result

YouTube showing repr() of a tuple

Thought this might amuse some of you: I'd heard that YouTube uses Python, but it's fun to see proof of that, even if it comes in the form of a minor bug. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list