So just stop talking. It's funny that you guys are having a
conversations about not responding to a guys post. First of all,
freedom of speech, blah blah, who cares, just let him alone. But
certainly don't go on his post, reply, telling people not to reply.
That's like saying EVEN THOUGH I'M
Fredrik Lundh napisał(a):
And if anyone wants to take the responsibiblity to warn the general
public that it is troll so innocent readers may not be tempted into
one, at least do it privately
>>>
>>>huh?
>>
>>Don't fed the troll, don't give him any public audience. Easy.
>
> by sendin
Jarek Zgoda wrote:
>>>And if anyone wants to take the responsibiblity to warn the general
>>>public that it is troll so innocent readers may not be tempted into
>>>one, at least do it privately
>>
>> huh?
>
> Don't fed the troll, don't give him any public audience. Easy.
by sending private mail t
I should not response here but just to show what would be the
consequence. If you send me a private mail instead of posting here,
there would be two less post for this thread, and if I didn't post, it
would be three less.
That is, only response privately to people responding to a troll would
reduc
Fredrik Lundh napisał(a):
>>And if anyone wants to take the responsibiblity to warn the general
>>public that it is troll so innocent readers may not be tempted into
>>one, at least do it privately
>
> huh?
Don't fed the troll, don't give him any public audience. Easy.
--
Jarek Zgoda
http://jp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And if anyone wants to take the responsibiblity to warn the general
> public that it is troll so innocent readers may not be tempted into
> one, at least do it privately
huh?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Something I don't quite understand, if people think it is troll, just
> ignore it. What I see is that people are feeding it by commenting about
> either him or his post. I saw a number of threads ended up that
> way(like the rather long o
Peter Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
>> Xah Leh is incompetent, but
>> apparently well-intentioned.
> In your view is that ("well-intentioned") an established fact at this
> point? I was still waiting for conclusive evidence.
No, it's not an established fact, which is why
Something I don't quite understand, if people think it is troll, just
ignore it. What I see is that people are feeding it by commenting about
either him or his post. I saw a number of threads ended up that
way(like the rather long one about Microsoft).
And if anyone wants to take the responsibibli
Mike Meyer wrote:
> Xah Leh is incompetent, but
> apparently well-intentioned.
In your view is that ("well-intentioned") an established fact at this
point? I was still waiting for conclusive evidence. So far the
evidence appears rather strongly in favour of a verdict of true
trollism, which
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Interesting opinions this man has, I must say. A Sith of Computing he
> may be?
No. Sith are competent but evil. Xah Leh is incompetent, but
apparently well-intentioned. Some of his opinions are correct, but
that appears to be more by accident than anything else, and t
Interesting opinions this man has, I must say. A Sith of Computing he
may be?
--
Svenn
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[New readers:
Please ignore the writings of this unbalanced individual, who is
well-known for posting inappropriate and inflammatory material on many
different newsgroups and mailing lists].
Xah Lee wrote:
> the Journey of Foreign Characters thru Internet
>
> Xah Lee, 20051101
>
> There's a b
the Journey of Foreign Characters thru Internet
Xah Lee, 20051101
There's a bunch of confusions about the display of non-ascii characters
such as the bullet "•". These confusions are justifiable, because the
underlying stuff is technology, computing technologies, are in a laymen
sense, extremely
14 matches
Mail list logo
