On Thursday, September 3, 2015 at 6:55:06 PM UTC+2, Palpandi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is there any module available in python standard library for XML binding? If
> not, any other suggestions.
>
> Which is good for parsing large file?
> 1. XML binding
> 2. Creating our ow
Stefan Behnel writes:
> dieter schrieb am 09.09.2015 um 10:20:
>> Palpandi writes:
>>> Is it better to use pyxb than lxml?
>>>
>>> What are the advantages of lxml and pyxb?
>>
>> "pyxb" has a different aim than "lxml".
>>
>> "lxml" is a general purpose library to process XML documents.
>> It gi
dieter schrieb am 09.09.2015 um 10:20:
> Palpandi writes:
>> Is it better to use pyxb than lxml?
>>
>> What are the advantages of lxml and pyxb?
>
> "pyxb" has a different aim than "lxml".
>
> "lxml" is a general purpose library to process XML documents.
> It gives you an interface to the documen
On Thursday, 3 September 2015 22:25:06 UTC+5:30, Palpandi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is there any module available in python standard library for XML binding? If
> not, any other suggestions.
>
> Which is good for parsing large file?
> 1. XML binding
> 2. Creating our ow
Palpandi writes:
> Is it better to use pyxb than lxml?
>
> What are the advantages of lxml and pyxb?
"pyxb" has a different aim than "lxml".
"lxml" is a general purpose library to process XML documents.
It gives you an interface to the document's resources (elements,
attributes, comments, proce
Hi All,
Is it better to use pyxb than lxml?
What are the advantages of lxml and pyxb?
Thanks,
Palpandi
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi,
On 03/09/2015 21:54, Burak Arslan wrote:
Hello,
On 09/03/15 19:54, Palpandi wrote:
Hi All,
Is there any module available in python standard library for XML binding? If
not, any other suggestions.
lxml is the right xml library to use. You can use lxml's objectify or Spyne.
I s
In a message of Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:46:33 +0200, Laura Creighton writes:
>In a message of Thu, 03 Sep 2015 22:21:29 -0700, Palpandi writes:
>>Thanks Burak.
>>
>>lmxl is good. But it is not supported with python 2.5. Any other option?
>>--
>>https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
>c
In a message of Thu, 03 Sep 2015 22:21:29 -0700, Palpandi writes:
>Thanks Burak.
>
>lmxl is good. But it is not supported with python 2.5. Any other option?
>--
>https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
check and see what python you have. If 2.6 or more recent, use lxml
If you have 2
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Palpandi wrote:
> Thanks Burak.
>
> lmxl is good. But it is not supported with python 2.5. Any other option?
The latest version isn't. But PyPI has an older version which is:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/lxml/3.3.6
You should be able to install that into a Python
Thanks Burak.
lmxl is good. But it is not supported with python 2.5. Any other option?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello,
On 09/03/15 19:54, Palpandi wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is there any module available in python standard library for XML binding? If
> not, any other suggestions.
lxml is the right xml library to use. You can use lxml's objectify or Spyne.
Here are some examples:
http://
Hi All,
Is there any module available in python standard library for XML binding? If
not, any other suggestions.
Which is good for parsing large file?
1. XML binding
2. Creating our own classes
Thanks,
Palpandi
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
13 matches
Mail list logo