Mike Meyer wrote:
> If your web apps are well-written, any of them should work. As
> previously stated, Sturgeon's law applies to the web, so chances are
> good they aren't well-written.
:)
>> But as soon as some user of platform 54 tries your website, she'll
>> encounter some weird behavior with
Ulrich Hobelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
>> I'm still waiting for an answer to that one - where's the Java toolkit
>> that handles full-featured GUIs as well as character cell
>> interfaces. Without that, you aren't doing the job that the web
>> technologies do.
> Where is t
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:35:05 -0400, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Ulrich Hobelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Mike Meyer
I wonder could you guys stop cross-posting this stuff to
comp.lang.perl.misc? The person who started this thread - a
well-known troll - saw fit to post it there,
Mike Meyer wrote:
> I'm still waiting for an answer to that one - where's the Java toolkit
> that handles full-featured GUIs as well as character cell
> interfaces. Without that, you aren't doing the job that the web
> technologies do.
Where is the text-mode browser that would even run part of the
Ulrich Hobelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
>>> I'd rather develop a native client for the machine that people
>>> actually WANT to use, instead of forcing them to use that
>>> little-fiddly web browser on a teeny tiny display.
>> You missed the point: How are you going to prov
Mike Meyer wrote:
>> I'd rather develop a native client for the machine that people
>> actually WANT to use, instead of forcing them to use that
>> little-fiddly web browser on a teeny tiny display.
>
> You missed the point: How are you going to provide native clients for
> platforms you've never
Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Mike Meyer wrote:
>> I think you're right - a web standard designed for writing real
>> applications probably wouldn't start life as a markup for text. The
>> only thing I can think of that even tries is Flash, but it's
> What about Java?
On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, Mike Meyer wrote:
> I think you're right - a web standard designed for writing real
> applications probably wouldn't start life as a markup for text. The
> only thing I can think of that even tries is Flash, but it's
What about Java?
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, OpenSolaris CA
Ulrich Hobelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
>>> This can be designed much better by using iframes, maybe even Ajax.
>> Definitely with Ajax. That's one of the things it does really well.
> But then you're probably limited to the big 4 of browsers: MSIE,
> Mozilla, KHTML/Safari,
