Re: Why is a JIT compiler faster than a byte-compiler

2005-03-26 Thread Alexey Shamrin
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-psyco.html?t=gr,lnxw03=PsycoC http://gnosis.cx/publish/programming/charming_python_b9.html On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:22:03 +0100, Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallöchen! > > "dodoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > http://www-9

Re: Why is a JIT compiler faster than a byte-compiler

2005-03-26 Thread Torsten Bronger
HallÃchen! "dodoo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://www-900.ibm.com/developerworks/cn/linux/sdk/python/charm-28/index_eng.shtml I can't reach it. Is there an alternative URL? TschÃ, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-l

Re: Why is a JIT compiler faster than a byte-compiler

2005-03-24 Thread RickMuller
Thanks for the link. That completely answers my question. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Why is a JIT compiler faster than a byte-compiler

2005-03-24 Thread dodoo
http://www-900.ibm.com/developerworks/cn/linux/sdk/python/charm-28/index_eng.shtml -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Why is a JIT compiler faster than a byte-compiler

2005-03-24 Thread RickMuller
I was talking to a friend of mine about the speed of Python code. One of the questions that came up was why is a JIT compiler like Psyco faster than the Python byte-compiler? I understand why languages like Pyrex are faster, since they set static types that the compiler can use to optimize. But why