On 10/9/20 1:02 AM, Muhammad Saad wrote:
>
>
>
>
>Sent from [1]Mail for Windows 10
>
>I Want To Reinstall Python Now Which Version I Install Now
>
> References
>
>Visible links
>1. https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=5509
Sent from [1]Mail for Windows 10
I Want To Reinstall Python Now Which Version I Install Now
References
Visible links
1. https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Ramchandra Apte wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 14:11:56 UTC+5:30, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 14:04:56 UTC+5:30, alex23 wrote:
> > > On 12 Sep, 16:31, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> > > > Perhaps this will sway youhttp://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.3.html
> >
[ Ramchandra Apte wrote on Tue 11.Sep'12 at 19:58:29 -0700 ]
> On Tuesday, 11 September 2012 22:19:08 UTC+5:30, Charles Hottel wrote:
> > I have a lot of programming experience in many different languages and now
> >
> > I want to learn Python. Which version do you
On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 14:11:56 UTC+5:30, Ramchandra Apte wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 14:04:56 UTC+5:30, alex23 wrote:
>
> > On 12 Sep, 16:31, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Perhaps this will sway youhttp://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.3.html
>
> >
>
> > > Ther
On Wednesday, 12 September 2012 14:04:56 UTC+5:30, alex23 wrote:
> On 12 Sep, 16:31, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> > Perhaps this will sway youhttp://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.3.html
>
> > There is no longer an equivalent document for the Python 1.x or 2.x
>
> > series of releases.
>
>
>
>
On 12 Sep, 16:31, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> Perhaps this will sway youhttp://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/3.3.html
> There is no longer an equivalent document for the Python 1.x or 2.x
> series of releases.
Perhaps not for 1.x but the 2.x series is still covered:
http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/
On 11/09/2012 17:49, Charles Hottel wrote:
I have a lot of programming experience in many different languages and now
I want to learn Python. Which version do you suggest I download, Python 2.x
or Python 3.x ? Also why should I prefer one over the other?
Right now I am thinkng Python 3.x as
I try to usually use several versions to know the difference. You never
know when a package might come along, and you want to try it out, and then
version becomes compatibility.
Alternatively, a client might come along and insist that a particular
version be used.
Do a little quick research on th
On Tuesday, 11 September 2012 22:19:08 UTC+5:30, Charles Hottel wrote:
> I have a lot of programming experience in many different languages and now
>
> I want to learn Python. Which version do you suggest I download, Python 2.x
>
> or Python 3.x ? Also why should I prefer one
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 02:11:22 +, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:17:14 -0700, Peter wrote:
>
>> If your desire is to "learn" Python then I would stick to 2.7
>>
>> My reasoning would be that there are still a significant number of
>> packages that have not been ported to 3.x (
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:17:14 -0700, Peter wrote:
> If your desire is to "learn" Python then I would stick to 2.7
>
> My reasoning would be that there are still a significant number of
> packages that have not been ported to 3.x (and may never be ported).
But if all you want is to learn Python, t
On 2012.09.11 19:17, Peter wrote:
> If your desire is to "learn" Python then I would stick to 2.7
>
> My reasoning would be that there are still a significant number of packages
> that have not been ported to 3.x (and may never be ported).
This is true, but the /potential/ for the need for one of
If your desire is to "learn" Python then I would stick to 2.7
My reasoning would be that there are still a significant number of packages
that have not been ported to 3.x (and may never be ported).
Not having looked at the changes in 3.x (so don't flame me! :-)), it would seem
that anything yo
"Charles Hottel" writes:
> I have a lot of programming experience in many different languages and now
> I want to learn Python.
Good for you, and welcome!
> Which version do you suggest I download, Python 2.x or Python 3.x ?
> Also why should I prefer one over the othe
On 11/09/2012 17:49, Charles Hottel wrote:
I have a lot of programming experience in many different languages and now
I want to learn Python. Which version do you suggest I download, Python 2.x
or Python 3.x ? Also why should I prefer one over the other?
Right now I am thinkng Python 3.x as
of programming experience in many different languages and now
> I want to learn Python. Which version do you suggest I download, Python
> 2.x
> or Python 3.x ? Also why should I prefer one over the other?
>
> Right now I am thinkng Python 3.x as it has been out since 2008, but I have
>
I have a lot of programming experience in many different languages and now
I want to learn Python. Which version do you suggest I download, Python 2.x
or Python 3.x ? Also why should I prefer one over the other?
Right now I am thinkng Python 3.x as it has been out since 2008, but I have
*#How to use setup.py file with py2exe:*
**
python daniesetup.py py2exe --bundle 1
*#Also the data files have to taken care off in the options* list
*#Here is a sample setup.py:*
*#*
from distutils.core import setup
import py2exe
import sys
# n
> the method involves editing python26.dll in order to remove
> dependency references and then dropping msvcr90.dll in the same
> directory as the py2exe produced executable.
Clever idea Waldemar, thanks for that, but for the moment, using the
dll as a win32 assembly (ie. with a manifest file, as
Waldemar,
Thank your for sharing your technique - works great with 32-bit Python
2.6.4.
Has anyone tried this with a 64-bit version of Python?
Malcolm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 30, 10:05 am, kakarukeys wrote:
> I tried on a fresh XP on VM. I moved all dlls in C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS
> which are in the file handles shown by Process Explorer including the
> 3 CRT dlls to the my dist folder and the two subfolders suggested
> byhttp://wiki.wxpython.org/py2exe. It didn't wo
Hi all,
#use py2exe properly to create a single distributable exe
#setup.py- create a single exe that runs all boxex
from distutils.core import setup
import py2exe
import sys
# no arguments
if len(sys.argv) == 1:
sys.argv.append("py2exe")
# creates a standalone .exe file, no zip files
setup(
I tried on a fresh XP on VM. I moved all dlls in C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS
which are in the file handles shown by Process Explorer including the
3 CRT dlls to the my dist folder and the two subfolders suggested by
http://wiki.wxpython.org/py2exe. It didn't work out. My app couldn't
start. Windows XP gave a
Jonathan Hartley writes:
> I guess I really need an installer. Oh well.
This need not be that much of a hurdle. Several solutions exist such
as Inno Setup (my personal preference), NSIS, etc... which are not
hard to create a solid installer with. I suspect your end users will
appreciate it too
On 29/12/2009 18:31, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
Jonathan,
I'm going to try to run vcredist_x86.exe automatically (as opposed to
asking my users to download and run it manually). I don't currently
have any installer, so I'm going to run vcredist_x86.exe on my
application start-up. Some logic like
Jonathan,
I'm going to try to run vcredist_x86.exe automatically (as opposed to
asking my users to download and run it manually). I don't currently
have any installer, so I'm going to run vcredist_x86.exe on my
application start-up. Some logic like this seems to do this trick:
if platform.sy
>> However, this takes a few seconds to run. Is there a sensible way for
>> me to only run this if the required DLL is not already installed? How
>> should I be detecting that?
Look at windows\winsxs\
>> Also: Will this work on 64 bit machines? Or do I not need to worry
>> about that?
If you shi
On Dec 29, 2:24 pm, Jonathan Hartley wrote:
> On Dec 27, 1:51 pm, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Martin,
>
> > > You'll need to include Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest and msvcr90.dll.
>
> > Thank you for your answers. From my research and testing on this topic:
>
> > 1. Can I safely place the
On Dec 27, 1:51 pm, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> > You'll need to include Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest and msvcr90.dll.
>
> Thank you for your answers. From my research and testing on this topic:
>
> 1. Can I safely place these 2 files in the same folder as my Py2exe
> generated EXE fi
On 27/12/2009 05:18, Stephen Hansen wrote:
Jonathan Hartley mailto:tart...@tartley.com>>
writes:
These
are non-technical users, so I'd rather send them a single executable
that 'just works',
[break]
rather than asking them to install Python and then
coach them through
> Thank you for your answers. From my research and testing on this topic:
Unfortunately, I can't answer these questions for py2exe. In principle,
it would hope that it is possible to include the DLLs *in* the
executable, if the py2exe mode is used where it includes all DLLs.
Regards,
Martin
--
h
Hi Martin,
> You'll need to include Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest and msvcr90.dll.
Thank you for your answers. From my research and testing on this topic:
1. Can I safely place these 2 files in the same folder as my Py2exe
generated EXE file or do I need to place the MSVCR90.DLL file in a
speciall
> Does anyone have any recommendations on which version of the
> MSVC?90.DLL's need to be distributed with a Python 2.6.4 PY2EXE (0.6.9)
> based executable?
You'll need to include Microsoft.VC90.CRT.manifest and msvcr90.dll.
Regards,
Martin
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> FYI, my experience is that an entire manifest must be distributed. As
> the manifest in question actually lists 3 DLLs, IIUC, you must ship all
> 4 files - the 3 DLLs and the manifest, even if only one of the DLLs is
> actually used.
You don't actually need to include all three DLLs. Just inclu
Jonathan Hartley writes:
> These
are non-technical users, so I'd rather send them a single executable
> that 'just works',
[break]
rather than asking them to install Python and then
> coach them through running a script - they would HATE that as a
> solution.
>
Whoa... How can you go from
Jonathan Hartley writes:
> 2) About once a week the last couple of months I've had a friend phone
> to say 'can you write me a simple program to do X', where X is stuff
> like calling a web API to look up info for every postcode/zipcode in a
> database. This sort of thing is ideally suited to Pyt
On Dec 26, 3:14 pm, Ross Ridge wrote:
> Jonathan Hartley wrote:
>
> >Am I right to infer that if I want to distribute a py2exe'd
> >application legally, and have half a chance of it working on a non-
> >developer's machine, then I have to:
>
> >a) Ask my users to run the Visual C++ redistributab
Jonathan Hartley wrote:
>Am I right to infer that if I want to distribute a py2exe'd
>application legally, and have half a chance of it working on a non-
>developer's machine, then I have to:
>
>a) Ask my users to run the Visual C++ redistributable installer, as
>well as download my program. This
On Dec 21, 2:56 pm, Ross Ridge wrote:
> Jonathan Hartley wrote:
>
> >Many thanks for that, but my issue is that my programs work fine for
> >me on my computer - but then fail on other people's computers. I'd
> >very strongly prefer for my users to not have to install the MSVCR
> >redistributable
Jonathan Hartley wrote:
>Many thanks for that, but my issue is that my programs work fine for
>me on my computer - but then fail on other people's computers. I'd
>very strongly prefer for my users to not have to install the MSVCR
>redistributable installer as well as my program - it would be much
On Dec 17, 11:16 pm, Mark Hammond wrote:
> On 18/12/2009 7:44 AM, Ross Ridge wrote:
>
> > The "P" DLL is for C++ and so the original poster may not actually need
> > it. I'm pretty sure Python itself doesn't need it, and py2exe shouldn't
> > either, but wxPython, or more precisely wxWidgets, almo
On Dec 17, 8:39 pm, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Jonathan Hartley wrote:
> > Only this week I sent a py2exe-derived executable to someone else (a
> > non-developer) and it would not run on their WinXP machine ("'The
> > system cannot execute the specified program'") - my current favourite
> > hypothe
On 18/12/2009 7:44 AM, Ross Ridge wrote:
The "P" DLL is for C++ and so the original poster may not actually need
it. I'm pretty sure Python itself doesn't need it, and py2exe shouldn't
either, but wxPython, or more precisely wxWidgets, almost certainly does.
So in your case you'll probably need
Jonathan Hartley wrote:
>1) I don't understand why the OP's question doesn't deserve a literal
>answer ...
I gave what I thought was a simple, direct and literal answer.
>.. isn't one of those DLLs in the WinSxS directory derived from
>his MSVC install?
I have no idea. He might not even have
Jonathan Hartley wrote:
> Only this week I sent a py2exe-derived executable to someone else (a
> non-developer) and it would not run on their WinXP machine ("'The
> system cannot execute the specified program'") - my current favourite
> hypothesis is that my omission of this dll or something simila
On Dec 17, 5:36 pm, Ross Ridge wrote:
> wrote:
> >Does anyone have any recommendations on which version of the
> >MSVC?90.DLL's need to be distributed with a Python 2.6.4 PY2EXE (0.6.9)
> >based executable? (I assume I need just a matching pair of MSVCR90.DLL
> >
wrote:
>Does anyone have any recommendations on which version of the
>MSVC?90.DLL's need to be distributed with a Python 2.6.4 PY2EXE (0.6.9)
>based executable? (I assume I need just a matching pair of MSVCR90.DLL
>and MSVCP90.DLL?)
Either the one the came with your copy Micros
Does anyone have any recommendations on which version of the
MSVC?90.DLL's need to be distributed with a Python 2.6.4 PY2EXE (0.6.9)
based executable? (I assume I need just a matching pair of MSVCR90.DLL
and MSVCP90.DLL?)
My understanding is that I need to match the version of the DLL'
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:04:25 -0500 Peng Yu wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Andreas Waldenburger
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0500 Peng Yu
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle
> >> wrote:
> >> What are the differences between 2.5 and 2.6?
> >
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Andreas Waldenburger
wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0500 Peng Yu wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle
>> wrote:
>> What are the differences between 2.5 and 2.6?
>
> http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.6.html
Are all packages availab
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:52:44 -0500 Peng Yu wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle
> wrote:
> What are the differences between 2.5 and 2.6?
http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.6.html
/W
--
INVALID? DE!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:27 AM, John Nagle wrote:
> Kee Nethery wrote:
>>
>> I am in 2.x because the IDE I am using does not support stepping through
>> my code when in 3.x. As soon as the IDE I use supports debugging in 3.x, I'm
>> moving up to 3.x.
>>
>> I would prefer to be in 3.x because all
On Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:25:47 -0700, Kee Nethery wrote:
> I would prefer to be in 3.x because all the inconsistencies of how you
> do things in 2.x make it harder than it needs to be to learn the
> language.
>
> People who have been coding in 2.x for along time don't notice how the
> syntax is won
I have just started using 2.6 (upgrade from 2.5). All my web
applications' code (using Django), work without any changes.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Kee Nethery wrote:
I am in 2.x because the IDE I am using does not support stepping through
my code when in 3.x. As soon as the IDE I use supports debugging in 3.x,
I'm moving up to 3.x.
I would prefer to be in 3.x because all the inconsistencies of how you
do things in 2.x make it harder tha
I am in 2.x because the IDE I am using does not support stepping
through my code when in 3.x. As soon as the IDE I use supports
debugging in 3.x, I'm moving up to 3.x.
I would prefer to be in 3.x because all the inconsistencies of how you
do things in 2.x make it harder than it needs to be
t the code developed in newer versions might be better
supported in the future. Can somebody give a guideline on which
version of python a new python developer shall choose?
My own view is start with 3.1 and move back to 2.6 or even 2.5 when you
need a library not available with 3.1. Others wil
e libraries than newer
> > versions. But the code developed in newer versions might be better
> > supported in the future. Can somebody give a guideline on which
> > version of python a new python developer shall choose?
>
> My own view is start with 3.1 and move back to 2.6 o
code developed in newer versions might be better
> supported in the future. Can somebody give a guideline on which
> version of python a new python developer shall choose?
>
> Regards,
> Peng
Boxers or briefs? ;-)
Well both have pros and cons. As for myself i am using 2.x until it
etter
supported in the future. Can somebody give a guideline on which
version of python a new python developer shall choose?
My own view is start with 3.1 and move back to 2.6 or even 2.5 when you
need a library not available with 3.1. Others will say start with 2.6 or
2.5. This has been disc
uture. Can somebody give a guideline on which
version of python a new python developer shall choose?
Regards,
Peng
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
"W. eWatson" wrote:
>
>I'm going to try out wxPython 2.8.92 for py25. It seems like the ansi
>version is the choice for me. The other choice has unicode. Do I care?
Well, there's a subtle point that gives me an opportunity to point out a
lesser-known "feature" of the NT-based systems (XP, Vista,
Mike Driscoll wrote:
On Feb 19, 11:29 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
W. eWatson wrote:
eric_dex...@msn.com wrote:
On Feb 19, 8:22 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
I'm going to try out wxPython 2.8.92 for py25. It seems like the ansi
version is the choice for me. The other choice has unicode. Do I care?
--
On Feb 19, 11:29 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
> W. eWatson wrote:
> > eric_dex...@msn.com wrote:
> >> On Feb 19, 8:22 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
> >>> I'm going to try out wxPython 2.8.92 for py25. It seems like the ansi
> >>> version is the choice for me. The other choice has unicode. Do I care?
> >>> -
W. eWatson wrote:
eric_dex...@msn.com wrote:
On Feb 19, 8:22 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
I'm going to try out wxPython 2.8.92 for py25. It seems like the ansi
version is the choice for me. The other choice has unicode. Do I care?
--
W. eWatson
(121.01
eric_dex...@msn.com wrote:
On Feb 19, 8:22 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
I'm going to try out wxPython 2.8.92 for py25. It seems like the ansi
version is the choice for me. The other choice has unicode. Do I care?
--
W. eWatson
(121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 De
On Feb 19, 8:22 am, "W. eWatson" wrote:
> I'm going to try out wxPython 2.8.92 for py25. It seems like the ansi
> version is the choice for me. The other choice has unicode. Do I care?
> --
> W. eWatson
>
> (121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std.
I'm going to try out wxPython 2.8.92 for py25. It seems like the ansi
version is the choice for me. The other choice has unicode. Do I care?
--
W. eWatson
(121.015 Deg. W, 39.262 Deg. N) GMT-8 hr std. time)
Obz Site: 39° 15' 7" N, 121° 2
Eric,Fredrik,
Many thanks for your prompt advice, it was a 'better safe than sorry' type
of question.
Don
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Eric Wertman wrote:
The subprocess module is one though
footnote: subprocess works on older versions too, and can be trivially
installed along with your application under Python 2.2 and 2.3.
binary builds for Windows are available here:
http://effbot.org/downloads/#subprocess
--
http:
Don wrote:
I'm a reasonably experienced in other languages and have just decided to
get my feet wet with Python. But I'm using FC6 which has v2.4.4 installed,
is this good enough to start out with or am I likely to encounter bugs that
have been fixed in later versions.
Python 2.4 is definitely
> I'm a reasonably experienced in other languages and have just decided to
> get my feet wet with Python. But I'm using FC6 which has v2.4.4 installed,
> is this good enough to start out with or am I likely to encounter bugs that
> have been fixed in later versions.
I'm sure there will be other op
Hi,
I'm a reasonably experienced in other languages and have just decided to
get my feet wet with Python. But I'm using FC6 which has v2.4.4 installed,
is this good enough to start out with or am I likely to encounter bugs that
have been fixed in later versions.
Don
--
http://mail.python.org/mail
hi
from the web, i found 2 kinds of wrappers for libpcap, one is
pylibpcap, the other is pcapy. may i know which is more popularly
used? thanks
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I would strongly recomend ubuntu server 5.1. I installed it on about 15
servers. Its secure out of the box. no ports are open. It comes with
python 2.4.1 and a ton of python modules. The install requires only 1
cd and uses only 400 mb.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I have found my novice Linux users take to SUSE (either Gnome or KDE)
readily. Probably because the devfs interfaces to the windows interface
readily.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Magnus Lycka wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > ok, i m going to use Linux for my Python Programs, mainly because i
> > need to see what will these fork() and exec() do. So, can anyone tell
> > me which flavour of linux i should use, some say that Debian is more
> > programmer friendly, or shold
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ok, i m going to use Linux for my Python Programs, mainly because i
> need to see what will these fork() and exec() do. So, can anyone tell
> me which flavour of linux i should use, some say that Debian is more
> programmer friendly, or shold i use fedora, or Solaris.
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:39:54 -0800, Steve M wrote:
>
> Max wrote:
>
>> (Mark Shuttleworth, ...
>> really loves Python - he gave me quite a lot of money for using it).
>
> Please elaborate.
Mark Shuttleworth is a very wealthy man who is supporting the development
of Ubuntu. His wealth came from
Max wrote:
> (Mark Shuttleworth, ...
> really loves Python - he gave me quite a lot of money for using it).
Please elaborate.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
There is a new gratis VMWare player at
http://www.vmware.com/download/player/
You can download an image http://www.vmware.com/vmtn/vm/browserapp.html
that they call a Browser Appliance, but if I remember correctly it is
Ubuntu.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Terry Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Similarly, I see RPMs by ones and twos all over the place,
> and only a few places with DEBs. But the DEB repositories
> are HUGE.
Try rpmfind.net. It's not clear where the rpms reside, but it's not
really important - it's a huge collection of RPMs.
On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 11:53:03 +0200
Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It uses DEB packages, which are apparently better, but
> software (I find) is much easier to find in RPM format.
I find this a bit of a deceptive impression. It is easier to
find *third party* RPMs. OTOH, the Debian distribution m
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Sunday 06 November 2005 13:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>B) I need it to work on VMware Workstation 5
>
>
> Most do.
I installed Ubuntu on VMware Workstation 5 just a few days ago. Works
nicely. There's one small problem: when installing the VMware tools in
Ubuntu,
On Sunday 06 November 2005 13:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I m actually a Novice in Python as well as Linux, When i look up
> things on the internet about Linux Flavours, They are written so
> complex that it is difficult for me to understand, i am asking if
> anyone here know of a Linux Distribu
I m actually a Novice in Python as well as Linux, When i look up
things on the internet about Linux Flavours, They are written so
complex that it is difficult for me to understand, i am asking if
anyone here know of a Linux Distribution that is for beginners (I am a
new user of linux, therefore
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ok, i m going to use Linux for my Python Programs, mainly because i
> need to see what will these fork() and exec() do. So, can anyone tell
> me which flavour of linux i should use, some say that Debian is more
> programmer friendly, or shold i use fedora, or Solaris.
Dan M wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 04:26:38 -0600, blahman wrote:
>
>
>>ok, i m going to use Linux for my Python Programs, mainly because i
>>need to see what will these fork() and exec() do. So, can anyone tell
>>me which flavour of linux i should use, some say that Debian is more
>>programme
Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2005-11-05, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Programmer-friendly" is pretty vague. Gentoo is the only Linux distro
>> I've run into (which excludes a *lot* of Unix distros) that I'd
>> consider programmer friendly, because it doesn't split pac
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 12:50:44 +, Jeffrey Schwab wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> ok, i m going to use Linux for my Python Programs, mainly because i
>> need to see what will these fork() and exec() do. So, can anyone tell
>> me which flavour of linux i should use, some say that Debian is
On 2005-11-05, Dan M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I would recommend staying away from Fedora unless you have a
> friend who is well-versed in it and willing to help. I like the
> distributin ok (I run it on the laptop I'm writing this from) but it uses
> RPMs for package distribution, a
On 2005-11-05, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Programmer-friendly" is pretty vague. Gentoo is the only Linux distro
> I've run into (which excludes a *lot* of Unix distros) that I'd
> consider programmer friendly, because it doesn't split packages up
> into "user stuff" and "developer st
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 04:26:38 -0600, blahman wrote:
> ok, i m going to use Linux for my Python Programs, mainly because i
> need to see what will these fork() and exec() do. So, can anyone tell
> me which flavour of linux i should use, some say that Debian is more
> programmer friendly, or shold
Dan M wrote:
>
> Personally I would recommend staying away from Fedora unless you have a
> friend who is well-versed in it and willing to help. I like the
> distributin ok (I run it on the laptop I'm writing this from) but it uses
> RPMs for package distribution, and the rpm tools don't know how t
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 04:26:38 -0600, blahman wrote:
> ok, i m going to use Linux for my Python Programs, mainly because i
> need to see what will these fork() and exec() do. So, can anyone tell
> me which flavour of linux i should use, some say that Debian is more
> programmer friendly, or shold
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ok, i m going to use Linux for my Python Programs, mainly because i
> need to see what will these fork() and exec() do. So, can anyone tell
> me which flavour of linux i should use, some say that Debian is more
> programmer friendly, or shold i use fedora, or Solaris. Bec
Hi Michael,
I too use SUSE (9.3). The Novell operation has convinced me to
go back to SUSE, after some trials with Mandrake and Ubuntu.
Especially on the Python side all is ready up. But I will not go
into the complications of "fork" and "thread" programming...
Bye.
--
http://mail.python.org/mail
I have been away from unix/linux for a couple of years.
I went with SUSE. Just do an install all, and 10 gig later you
are done.
Very simple install, very easy admin with YAST.
If you are a power admin, there may be better release. But if you want
simple, but powerful, SUSE has worked well fo
And for complete control and customization of your os and hardware...
There's nothing like Gentoo!
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
