一首诗 wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I am writing a small network application with python.
The protocol is binary based and defined in c header files.
Now I'm using the upack function of 'struct' module, but it's really
annoying to write fmt strings for complicated structures.
What will be your choice
On approximately 11/4/2008 5:31 PM, came the following characters from
the keyboard of Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch:
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:52:17 -0800, 一首诗 wrote:
Now I'm using the upack function of 'struct' module, but it's really
annoying to write fmt strings for complicated structures.
What
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:52:17 -0800, 一首诗 wrote:
> Now I'm using the upack function of 'struct' module, but it's really
> annoying to write fmt strings for complicated structures.
>
> What will be your choice when handling binary structures?
http://construct.wikispaces.com/
Ciao,
Marc 'Bl
> Recently I am writing a small network application with python.
>
> The protocol is binary based and defined in c header files.
>
> Now I'm using the upack function of 'struct' module, but it's really
> annoying to write fmt strings for complicated structures.
>
> What will be your choice when han
一首诗 schrieb:
Hi all,
Recently I am writing a small network application with python.
The protocol is binary based and defined in c header files.
Now I'm using the upack function of 'struct' module, but it's really
annoying to write fmt strings for complicated structures.
What will be your choi
Hi all,
Recently I am writing a small network application with python.
The protocol is binary based and defined in c header files.
Now I'm using the upack function of 'struct' module, but it's really
annoying to write fmt strings for complicated structures.
What will be your choice when handlin
