FLChamp wrote:
> If anything was addressed to my problem then it has completely passed
> me by as most points were clearly made by a computer scientist and I am
> not one of those in the slightest. My experience of using any type of
> programming language is limited to the little we are taught in
Thanks for all your help everyone, if only it had addressed what I had
asked I may have actually learned something about Python!!
If anything was addressed to my problem then it has completely passed
me by as most points were clearly made by a computer scientist and I am
not one of those in the sl
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:59:41 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli)
wrote:
>Arthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> thinking that the visciousness with wihich you were attacking someone
>> suggesting a proposal for an optional feature - even if an iill
>> adivised proposal for and ill advised opt
Arthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thinking that the visciousness with wihich you were attacking someone
> suggesting a proposal for an optional feature - even if an iill
> adivised proposal for and ill advised optional feature (I frankly
> don't care much about that part of the discussion one wa
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:16:05 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli)
wrote:
> Having found out how to
>build a lasting killfile, I'd like to see if using it liberally on
>people who appear to post here just to provoke flamewars, rather than to
>offer and receive help, and participate in interesti
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:16:05 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli)
wrote:
>Arthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>Please clarify if you were making a lame joke without smilies, are
>utterly confused about what "declaration" *MEANS*, or what other folly
>prompted you to this astounding remark, t
Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I (and I believe Alex) object to name declaration *statements* and/or the
> strong typing of *names*.
I confirm that my key objection is to declarations in the strict sense:
thingies that aren't executable, but rather billets doux to the
compiler, for exam
Arthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is that VPython "vectors" are in effect flat 3 element Numeric arrays,
> and Numeric ararys can be constructed with Float64 specified as the
> datatype. (wonder if that speciufication is a "declaration", and if
> so whether that would indicate some conflict bet
"Arthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> is that VPython "vectors" are in effect flat 3 element Numeric arrays,
> and Numeric ararys can be constructed with Float64 specified as the
> datatype. (wonder if that speciufication is a "declaration", and if
> so whether t
On 9 Feb 2005 02:29:35 -0800, "FLChamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>SOrry if this message is a little confused, it most probably reflects
>the state of the author!
One bit of confusion is in names. There was a name space clash early
on. As things shook out "Visual Python" is ActiveState's Pytho
SOrry if this message is a little confused, it most probably reflects
the state of the author!
I have made a small program that plots the orbit of a planet in visual
python using visual.vector for all values. If i run the program it is
clear that the orbit is non-keplerian as the planets gradually
11 matches
Mail list logo
