Re: Using pipx for packages as opposed to applications

2025-01-13 Thread Thomas Passin via Python-list
On 1/12/2025 7:11 AM, Chris Green via Python-list wrote: Stefan Ram wrote: Chris Green wrote or quoted: E.g. I want to install and use pksheet but, as it's not available from the Debian repositories, I'll have to install it from PyPi. I can't dig up any "pksheet" on PyPI. So, you got to

Re: Using pipx for packages as opposed to applications

2025-01-13 Thread Chris Green via Python-list
Stefan Ram wrote: > Chris Green wrote or quoted: > >E.g. I want to install and use pksheet but, as it's not available from > >the Debian repositories, I'll have to install it from PyPi. > > I can't dig up any "pksheet" on PyPI. So, you got to take > my earlier response like a rumor from a ra

Re: Using pipx for packages as opposed to applications

2025-01-12 Thread Left Right via Python-list
What would be the intended use? If this is for other Debian users, then why not make a Debian package? If it's for yourself, why do you need to automate it? To be fair, I don't see a point in tools like pipx. Have never used it, and cannot imagine a scenario where I'd want to. It seems like th

Using pipx for packages as opposed to applications

2025-01-11 Thread Chris Green via Python-list
Can one use pipx to wrap the process of creating an independent environment for a python package as opposed to a runnable application? E.g. I want to install and use pksheet but, as it's not available from the Debian repositories, I'll have to install it from PyPi. So I should put it in its own e