On 2012-09-19, Pierre Tardy wrote:
> --===1362296571==
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554d3229e814204ca105e50
>
> --bcaec554d3229e814204ca105e50
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
>>
>> This has been proposed and discussed and even implemented many
>
> This has been proposed and discussed and even implemented many
> times on this list and others.
>
I can find this question on SO
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4984647/accessing-dict-keys-like-an-attribute-in-python
which is basically answered with this solution
class AttributeDict(dict):
Am 19.09.2012 12:24 schrieb Pierre Tardy:
One thing that is cooler with java-script than in python is that dictionaries
and objects are the same thing. It allows browsing of complex hierarchical data
syntactically easy.
For manipulating complex jsonable data, one will always prefer writing:
b
On 2012-09-19, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 09/19/2012 06:24 AM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
>> All implementation I tried are much slower than a pure native dict access.
>>
Each implementation have bench results in commit comment. All of them
>> are 20+x slower than plain dict!
>
> Assuming you're talking ab
On 09/19/2012 06:24 AM, Pierre Tardy wrote:
> One thing that is cooler with java-script than in python is that dictionaries
> and objects are the same thing. It allows browsing of complex hierarchical
> data syntactically easy.
You probably need some different terminology, since a dictionary is
One thing that is cooler with java-script than in python is that dictionaries
and objects are the same thing. It allows browsing of complex hierarchical data
syntactically easy.
For manipulating complex jsonable data, one will always prefer writing:
buildrequest.properties.myprop
rather than
brd
