Joakim Persson wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:15:18 +0200, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>This _shouldn't_ be too difficult -- I know which methods must be
>>>implemented (basically just some kind of event handling to deal with
>>>randomly arriving log points, should be implem
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:15:18 +0200, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> This _shouldn't_ be too difficult -- I know which methods must be
>> implemented (basically just some kind of event handling to deal with
>> randomly arriving log points, should be implemented as "onMsg()" on my
>> COM
Joakim Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 08:36:00 +0200, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>Sounds like a perfect job for comtypes, which is a COM library
>>implemented in pure Python, based on ctypes. comtypes should make it
>>easy to access custom (non-dispat
Andrew MacIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 08:36:00 +0200, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> {...}
>
>>(I have released and announced this 3 weeks ago, but haven't got a
>>single feedback. So it seems the need to access custom interfaces is
>>very low.)
>
> I
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 08:36:00 +0200, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Sounds like a perfect job for comtypes, which is a COM library
>implemented in pure Python, based on ctypes. comtypes should make it
>easy to access custom (non-dispatch derived) com interfaces, or the
>vtable based par
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 08:36:00 +0200, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
{...}
>(I have released and announced this 3 weeks ago, but haven't got a
>single feedback. So it seems the need to access custom interfaces is
>very low.)
I have downloaded it and am trying to find the time to play wi
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 08:36:00 +0200, Thomas Heller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Joakim Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I have a rather bloated C++ client prototype which "works", so I
>> should have all the code needed to invoke the interface, but this
>> client is of course rather bloated
Joakim Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> This means that I must come up with a way to interface Python with
> this log tool. After some investigations, I have run inte problems --
> my inital approach was to use Python + win32com to communicate with
> the COM interface. Unfortunately, it
Hello all. I am involved in a project where we have a desire to
improve our software testing tools, and I'm in charge of looking for
solutions regarding the logging of our software (originating from
embedded devices). Currently, we are using a heavyweight, proprietary
log tool developed by another
