On May 11, 2:13 am, Filip Štědronský <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main problem are references to objects within a module, because
> we can NEVER be sure there aren't any, even though we cleaned up
> everything, that's just a consequence of Python nature. We can keep
> the old objects referenced
The main problem are references to objects within a module, because
we can NEVER be sure there aren't any, even though we cleaned up
everything, that's just a consequence of Python nature. We can keep
the old objects referenced and it would make an equivalent to the
reload() builting, just without
We should have that statement, so that problems, expressed in
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/3bda1fc4895ec886/bc5fe40cfbd10124?lnk=raot#bc5fe40cfbd10124,
would not occur.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list