Martin v. LÃwis wrote:
Steve Horsley wrote:
It is my understanding that the BOM (U+feff) is actually the Unicode
character "Non-breaking zero-width space".
My understanding is that this used to be the case. According to
http://www.unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#38
the application should now speci
Steve Horsley wrote:
It is my understanding that the BOM (U+feff) is actually the Unicode
character "Non-breaking zero-width space".
My understanding is that this used to be the case. According to
http://www.unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#38
the application should now specify specific processing,
Francis Girard wrote:
Le lundi 7 Mars 2005 21:54, "Martin v. LÃwis" a Ãcrit :
Hi,
Thank you for your very informative answer. Some interspersed remarks follow.
I personally would write my applications so that they put the signature
into files that cannot be concatenated meaningfully (since the
si
""Martin v. LÃwis"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Francis Girard wrote:
Well, no text files can't be concatenated ! Sooner or later, someone will
use "cat" on the text files your application did generate. That will be a
lot of fun for the new unicode aware "super-ca
Hi,
Thank you for your answer. That confirms what Martin v. LÃwis says. You can
choose between UCS-2 or UCS-4 for internal unicode representation.
Francis Girard
Le mardi 8 Mars 2005 00:44, Jeff Epler a ÃcritÂ:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:56:57PM +0100, Francis Girard wrote:
> > BTW, the pytho
Hi,
> Well, no. For example, Python source code is not typically concatenated,
> nor is source code in any other language.
We did it with C++ files in order to have only one compilation unit to
accelarate compilation time over network. Also, all the languages with some
"include" directive will
Francis Girard wrote:
Well, no text files can't be concatenated ! Sooner or later, someone will use
"cat" on the text files your application did generate. That will be a lot of
fun for the new unicode aware "super-cat".
Well, no. For example, Python source code is not typically concatenated,
nor
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:56:57PM +0100, Francis Girard wrote:
> BTW, the python "unicode" built-in function documentation says it returns a
> "unicode" string which scarcely means something. What is the python
> "internal" unicode encoding ?
The language reference says farily little about unic
Le lundi 7 Mars 2005 21:54, "Martin v. LÃwis" a ÃcritÂ:
Hi,
Thank you for your very informative answer. Some interspersed remarks follow.
>
> I personally would write my applications so that they put the signature
> into files that cannot be concatenated meaningfully (since the
> signature simp
Francis Girard wrote:
If I understand well, into the UTF-8 unicode binary representation, some
systems add at the beginning of the file a BOM mark (Windows?), some don't.
(Linux?). Therefore, the exact same text encoded in the same UTF-8 will
result in two different binary files, and of a slightl
Hi,
For the first time in my programmer life, I have to take care of character
encoding. I have a question about the BOM marks.
If I understand well, into the UTF-8 unicode binary representation, some
systems add at the beginning of the file a BOM mark (Windows?), some don't.
(Linux?). Therefo
11 matches
Mail list logo
