On 14Oct2018 20:24, Shakti Kumar wrote:
On 13Oct2018 14:10, Shakti Kumar wrote:
I’m running a script which basically does a traceroute to the list of
hosts
provided, and then pulls up some info by logging in to gateways in the
path.
I am running this script for a list of almost 40k hosts in
>On 13Oct2018 14:10, Shakti Kumar wrote:
>>I’m running a script which basically does a traceroute to the list of
>>hosts
>>provided, and then pulls up some info by logging in to gateways in the
path.
>>I am running this script for a list of almost 40k hosts in our data
centers.
>>Also, I am using
On 13Oct2018 14:10, Shakti Kumar wrote:
I’m running a script which basically does a traceroute to the list of
hosts
provided, and then pulls up some info by logging in to gateways in the path.
I am running this script for a list of almost 40k hosts in our data centers.
Also, I am using commands
Hi Shakti
You wrote:
> out = commands.getstatusoutput('traceroute ' + ip)
The page
https://docs.python.org/3/library/subprocess.html#legacy-shell-invocation-functions
describes subprocess.getstatusoutput as one of the "legacy functions from the
2.x commands module. These operations implicitly
>Hello,
>I’m running a script which basically does a traceroute to the list of
hosts provided, and then pulls up some info by logging in to gateways in
the path.
>I am running this script for a list of almost 40k hosts in our data
centers.
>Also, I am using commands module to get the traceroute out
Hello,
I’m running a script which basically does a traceroute to the list of hosts
provided, and then pulls up some info by logging in to gateways in the path.
I am running this script for a list of almost 40k hosts in our data centers.
Also, I am using commands module to get the traceroute output.
psaff...@googlemail.com wrote:
> I'm building a pipeline involving a number of shell tools. In each
> case, I create a temporary file using tempfile.mkstmp() and invoke a
> command ("cmd < /tmp/tmpfile") on it using subprocess.Popen.
>
> At the end of each section, I call close() on the file handl
I'm building a pipeline involving a number of shell tools. In each
case, I create a temporary file using tempfile.mkstmp() and invoke a
command ("cmd < /tmp/tmpfile") on it using subprocess.Popen.
At the end of each section, I call close() on the file handles and use
os.remove() to delete them. Ev
TheDavidFactor wrote:
[...] It's a deamon that runs on a linux box
and every 15 seconds it checks a MySQL table for new records, if there
are any it creates a .call file on the Asterisk server using ssh, it
also checks the Asterisk server, again via ssh, for any finished calls
and if there are an
In article
,
TheDavidFactor wrote:
> I have double checked that it is closing the socket. I don't know what
> else to check, any suggestions would be much appreciated.
All of the symptoms you report point to sockets not getting closed. What
does "double checked" mean? Don't rely on __del__
I'm new to python, but have been writing programs in other languages
for about 15 years now. As part of my job I develop applications that
interface with Asterisk in various ways. As a way of getting my feet
wet I decided to try to rewrite an outbound call script that I have in
another language int
g the file is very time consuming. I'd rather have
> the files all open for the duration, do all writes and then close them
> all at the end.
> The problem I have under windows is that as soon as I get to 500 files I
> get the Too many open files message. I tried the same thing
En Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:50:15 -0200, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribi�:
> Jeff wrote:
>> Why don't you start around 50 threads at a time to do the file
>> writes? Threads are effective for IO. You open the source file,
>> start a queue, and start sending data sets to be written to t
ime consuming. I'd rather have
> the files all open for the duration, do all writes and then close them
> all at the end.
> The problem I have under windows is that as soon as I get to 500 files I
> get the Too many open files message. I tried the same thing in Delphi
>
Steven D'Aprano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:57:39 +0100, AMD wrote:
>
>> The problem I have under windows is that as soon as I get to 500 files I
>> get the Too many open files message. I tried the same thing in Delphi
>> and I can ge
ery time consuming. I'd rather have
> the files all open for the duration, do all writes and then close them
> all at the end.
> The problem I have under windows is that as soon as I get to 500 files I
> get the Too many open files message. I tried the same thing in Delphi
>
Jeff wrote:
> Why don't you start around 50 threads at a time to do the file
> writes? Threads are effective for IO. You open the source file,
> start a queue, and start sending data sets to be written to the
> queue. Your source file processing can go on while the writes are
> done in other thr
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:57:39 +0100, AMD wrote:
> The problem I have under windows is that as soon as I get to 500 files I
> get the Too many open files message. I tried the same thing in Delphi
> and I can get to 3000 files. How can I increase the number of open files
> in Python?
Wi
Why don't you start around 50 threads at a time to do the file
writes? Threads are effective for IO. You open the source file,
start a queue, and start sending data sets to be written to the
queue. Your source file processing can go on while the writes are
done in other threads.
--
http://mail.
the files all open for the duration, do all writes and then close them
all at the end.
The problem I have under windows is that as soon as I get to 500 files I
get the Too many open files message. I tried the same thing in Delphi
and I can get to 3000 files. How can I increase the number of open
20 matches
Mail list logo
