Roger wrote:
>> either. I'd suggest a plain-python workaround along the lines of
>
> Wow. You just blew my mind. I'm going to play with this. Thanks a
> lot, I've really learned a lot in just that small bit. I don't have
> much experience in playing with a lot of the 'private' calls such as
>
> either. I'd suggest a plain-python workaround along the lines of
Wow. You just blew my mind. I'm going to play with this. Thanks a
lot, I've really learned a lot in just that small bit. I don't have
much experience in playing with a lot of the 'private' calls such as
__call__. I need to do
Roger wrote:
>> Note that I took out the lambdas and gave event arguments to the
>> functions; if you did that on purpose, because you need to call the same
>> functions without events, then just ignore that...
>> SO, the other workaround, which I've used, is to bind the event to a
>> generic func
> Note that I took out the lambdas and gave event arguments to the
> functions; if you did that on purpose, because you need to call the same
> functions without events, then just ignore that...
> SO, the other workaround, which I've used, is to bind the event to a
> generic function, and have that
Bad Mutha Hubbard wrote:
> Roger wrote:
>
>> I've done a lot of googling for this topic and I fear that it's not
>> possible. I have a widget that is overloaded with several bindings.
>> I want to be able to unbind one method form the same Event without
>> destroying all the other bindings to the
Roger wrote:
> I've done a lot of googling for this topic and I fear that it's not
> possible. I have a widget that is overloaded with several bindings.
> I want to be able to unbind one method form the same Event without
> destroying all the other bindings to the same event that's associated
> t
On Dec 18, 1:48 pm, Roger wrote:
> On Dec 18, 12:49 pm, r wrote:
>
> > Maybe someone will chime in with an answer, sorry i could not help.
> > ponder this, i must...
>
> Regardless, thanks for your help! I truly appreciate it.
>
> Roger.
'no problema mi amigo!'.to_english(no problem my friend!)
On Dec 18, 12:49 pm, r wrote:
> Maybe someone will chime in with an answer, sorry i could not help.
> ponder this, i must...
Regardless, thanks for your help! I truly appreciate it.
Roger.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 18, 12:49 pm, r wrote:
> Maybe someone will chime in with an answer, sorry i could not help.
> ponder this, i must...
Regardless, thanks for your help! I truly appreciate it.
Roger.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 18, 12:49 pm, r wrote:
> Maybe someone will chime in with an answer, sorry i could not help.
> ponder this, i must...
Regardless, thanks for your help! I truly appreciate it.
Roger.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 18, 12:49 pm, r wrote:
> Maybe someone will chime in with an answer, sorry i could not help.
> ponder this, i must...
Regardless, thanks for your help! I truly appreciate it.
Roger.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Maybe someone will chime in with an answer, sorry i could not help.
ponder this, i must...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 18, 11:40 am, r wrote:
> Yea, my answer was really not a helping answer(sorry) just showing
> exactly why this will not work with w.unbind(). Why do you need two
> separate functions to bind the same event?? You cannot combine the
> two??
I can't combine the two in my app unfortunately. T
Yea, my answer was really not a helping answer(sorry) just showing
exactly why this will not work with w.unbind(). Why do you need two
separate functions to bind the same event?? You cannot combine the
two??
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>funcid1 = root.bind("<1>", lambda e: test())
>funcid2 = root.bind("<1>", lambda e: test2(), add='+')
>root.unbind("<1>", funcid2)
Isn't this what I've done in my example code?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
w.unbind ( sequence, funcid=None )
This method deletes bindings on w for the event described by sequence.
If the second argument is a callback bound to that sequence, that
callback is removed and the rest, if any, are left in place. If the
second argument is omitted, all bindings are deleted.
see
I've done a lot of googling for this topic and I fear that it's not
possible. I have a widget that is overloaded with several bindings.
I want to be able to unbind one method form the same Event without
destroying all the other bindings to the same event that's associated
to the same widget.
For
17 matches
Mail list logo
