On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:05 AM, dieter wrote:
> Dan Stromberg writes:
>> I have a program http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~dstromberg/looper/
>> that I use and maintain.
>>
>> It's like GNU parallel or similar - yet another "run n processes, m at
>> a time" implementation. Interestingly, I've on
Dan Stromberg writes:
> I have a program http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~dstromberg/looper/
> that I use and maintain.
>
> It's like GNU parallel or similar - yet another "run n processes, m at
> a time" implementation. Interestingly, I've only used/tested it on
> Linux, but it's under a Microsoft
Dan Stromberg :
> That bug is: if you control-C the top-level process, all the
> subprocesses are left running.
Sorry, don't have a solution for your particular Python situation.
> I've been thinking about making it catch SIGINT, SIGTERM and SIGHUP,
> and having it SIGKILL its active subprocesses
Dan Stromberg writes:
> That bug is: if you control-C the top-level process, all the
> subprocesses are left running.
Are you setting the daemon flag?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> That bug is: if you control-C the top-level process, all the
> subprocesses are left running.
>
> I've been thinking about making it catch SIGINT, SIGTERM and SIGHUP,
> and having it SIGKILL its active subprocesses upon receiving one of
> th
I have a program http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~dstromberg/looper/
that I use and maintain.
It's like GNU parallel or similar - yet another "run n processes, m at
a time" implementation. Interestingly, I've only used/tested it on
Linux, but it's under a Microsoft copyright because Microsoft acqui
Am 26.05.2013 21:10, schrieb Daniel Gagliardi:
I want to know how to implement concurrent threads in Python
Have you tried searching the web or maybe looked on docs.python.org?
Seriously, show at least some effort before asking here.
Uli
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python
On 28 May 2013 05:06, "Daniel Gagliardi"
wrote:
>
> fuck! fuck! i'm gonna be fired if i didnt get this shit! i told my boss
id do it. fuck! im gonna pipe some crakc. fuck...
So do it. You've already been told how to.
It's true that python does not do real concurrent execution, but if most of
you
fuck! fuck! i'm gonna be fired if i didnt get this shit! i told my boss id
do it. fuck! im gonna pipe some crakc. fuck...
2013/5/26 Mark Lawrence
> On 26/05/2013 20:10, Daniel Gagliardi wrote:
>
>> I want to know how to implement concurrent threads in Python
>>
>&g
On 26/05/2013 20:10, Daniel Gagliardi wrote:
I want to know how to implement concurrent threads in Python
google, bing, duckduckgo, yahoo...
--
If you're using GoogleCrap™ please read this
http://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython.
Mark Lawrence
--
http://mail.python.org/ma
On 26/05/2013 22:27, Andrew Berg wrote:
On 2013.05.26 16:21, Daniel Gagliardi wrote:
shutup bitch! i do know python cannot concurrent threads. want a workaround
You're a charming fellow. I'm sure everyone will flock to help you.
So "How to win friends and influence people" had two authors.
On 2013.05.26 16:21, Daniel Gagliardi wrote:
> shutup bitch! i do know python cannot concurrent threads. want a workaround
You're a charming fellow. I'm sure everyone will flock to help you.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2013.05.26 14:10, Daniel Gagliardi wrote:
> I want to know how to implement concurrent threads in Python
With the threading module in the standard library.
http://docs.python.org/3.3/library/threading.html
There are plenty of tutorials on this out there; we'll be happy to help if
you&
I want to know how to implement concurrent threads in Python
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 2011-09-01, Stephen Hansen wrote:
> On 9/1/11 2:45 PM, George Kovoor wrote:
>> Why doesn't python threads show an associated PID? On spawning
>> python threads using the threading module I can only see the main
>> thread's pid on using top or ps unix command, no subprocesses are
>> displayed.
On 01Sep2011 15:27, Stephen Hansen wrote:
| On 9/1/11 2:45 PM, George Kovoor wrote:
| > Why doesn't python threads show an associated PID? On spawning python
| > threads using the threading module I can only see the main thread's pid on
| > using top or ps unix command, no subprocesses are displ
On 9/1/11 2:45 PM, George Kovoor wrote:
> Hi,
> Why doesn't python threads show an associated PID? On spawning python
> threads using the threading module I can only see the main thread's pid on
> using top or ps unix command, no subprocesses are displayed. In otherwords
> top or ps in not aware
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:19:56 -0700 (PDT), sturlamolden
wrote:
: To optimise computational code, notice that Python itself
: gives you a 200x performance penalty. That is much more
: important than not using all 4 cores on a quadcore processor.
: In this case, start by identifying bottlenecks
On Apr 21, 3:19 pm, dutche wrote:
> My question is about the efficiency of threads in python, does anybody
> has something to share?
Never mind all the FUD about the GIL. Most of it is ill-informed
and plain wrong.
The GIL prevents you from doing one thing, which is parallel
compute-boun
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 6:19 AM, dutche wrote:
> Hi folks, how are ya?
>
> Here's the thing...I had to make a program with threads and after
> finished, I found some posts and articles in Google about Python and
> threads, raising the question about if it really implements thread
> programming or
C api"? Do you mean that it uses
binary modules, as opposed to Python modules?
My question is about the efficiency of threads in python, does anybody
has something to share?
From your (rather unspecific) description, I gather that you are doing
mostly I/O operations. Threading i
some objects.
I have now in my program something about 8 threads and each of them
runs different code based on some directives, these codes relies
sometimes in C api, using classes like zipfile and tarfile, and others
relies only in python code.
My question is about the efficiency of threads in p
En Wed, 19 Mar 2008 04:43:34 -0300, Deepak Rokade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> Thanks all for removing confusion about GIL,
> one more question;
> If jobs to be processed by threds is I/O bound would multithreading help
> python to improve speed of application ?
> Since I read that " multithr
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Deepak Rokade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If jobs to be processed by threds is I/O bound would multithreading help
> python to improve speed of application ?
Probably, yes.
--
Cheers,
Simon B.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.brunningonline.net/simon/blog/
--
http:
ant to use therads in my application. Going through the docs , I
> read
> > > about GIL.
> > > Now I am confused whether using threads in python is safe or not.
> >
> > > One thing I know that if I am accessing global variables in two or
> more
> > &
On Mar 16, 3:40 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> En Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:57:44 -0200, Deepak Rokade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribi�:
>
> > I want to use therads in my application. Going through the docs , I read
> > about GIL.
> >
En Sat, 15 Mar 2008 11:57:44 -0200, Deepak Rokade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribi�:
> I want to use therads in my application. Going through the docs , I read
> about GIL.
> Now I am confused whether using threads in python is safe or not.
>
> One thing I know that if
Hi All,
I want to use therads in my application. Going through the docs , I read
about GIL.
Now I am confused whether using threads in python is safe or not.
One thing I know that if I am accessing global variables in two or more
threads I need to synchronize them
using locking or such mechanism
Yes
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:56 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 7:56 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > En Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:46:48 -0200, Manikandan R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hai,
> >
> > > Is it possible to share a single varia
On Feb 26, 7:56 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> En Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:46:48 -0200, Manikandan R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribió:
>
> > Hai,
>
> > Is it possible to share a single variable between multiple
> > threads. For eg:
>
> > Class A:
> > thread_init(
En Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:46:48 -0200, Manikandan R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> Hai,
>
> Is it possible to share a single variable between multiple
> threads. For eg:
>
> Class A:
> thread_init()
>
>def run():
> fun1()
>
> def fun():
> assume s
Hai,
Is it possible to share a single variable between multiple
threads. For eg:
Class A:
thread_init()
def run():
fun1()
def fun():
assume some arithmatic operation is going on according to the
input given and each fun will *give different outp
Hai,
Is it possible to share a single variable between multiple
threads. For eg:
Class A:
thread_init()
def run():
fun1()
def fun():
assume some arithmatic operation is going on according to the
input given and each fun will *give different outp
y have to finish a project which uses multiple threads in
> Python, and i shouldn't use the time.sleep() function.
> Is there any posibility to use multiple threads without using the
> time.sleep() function ? And if so, what that way should be ?
>
> Best regards,
> _Cosmin
Hello.
I know that Python is not fully threadsafe.
Unlike Java, where threading was considered to be so important that it is a part
of the syntax, in Python threads were laid down at the altar of Portability.
But, i really have to finish a project which uses multiple threads in
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:46:57 -0700, "Leonard J. Reder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Mark,
I took your three day course here at JPL and recall that you said something
was wrong with the implementation of threads within Python
but I cannot recall what. So what is wrong with t
annot recall what. So what is wrong with threads in Python?
I'm going to guess that he meant the Global Interpreter Lock is what's
wrong with Python threads. You can read about it in the docs at
http://docs.python.org/api/threads.html and get some good analysis
from Ian Bicking (with some e
On 4/25/05, Leonard J. Reder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> I took your three day course here at JPL and recall that you said
> something was wrong with the implementation of threads within Python
> but I cannot recall what. So what is wrong with threads in
Hello Mark,
I took your three day course here at JPL and recall that you said
something was wrong with the implementation of threads within Python
but I cannot recall what. So what is wrong with threads in Python?
The other part of this question is, if there is something wrong with
the threads
39 matches
Mail list logo
