Re: Threads and Interpreter death

Rene Pijlman wrote: > Carl J. Van Arsdall: > >>I've been toying with threads a lot lately and I've noticed that if a >>scripting error occurs in a thread the thread dies, but not the process >>that spawned the thread. >> >>Is python supposed to behave this way or is this type of behavior >>acci

Re: Threads and Interpreter death

Carl J. Van Arsdall: >I've been toying with threads a lot lately and I've noticed that if a >scripting error occurs in a thread the thread dies, but not the process >that spawned the thread. > >Is python supposed to behave this way or is this type of behavior >accidental? "start_new_thread(func

Threads and Interpreter death

I've been toying with threads a lot lately and I've noticed that if a scripting error occurs in a thread the thread dies, but not the process that spawned the thread. Is python supposed to behave this way or is this type of behavior accidental? Thanks, Carl -- Carl J. Van Arsdall [EMAIL P