Lie Ryan writes:
> There are lots of reason why bare-except is bad, one being is that it
> makes it way too easy to ignore errors that you don't actually want to
> silence; and given that bare-excepts would prevent Ctrl+C (Interrupt)
> from working. Sorry, but IMHO we shouldn't make syntax sugar
o inflect it as a verb, not a noun -- you are telling the
> block to be silent). Finally, since this is the purest form of
> syntactic sugar, I cannot fathom any parsing, interpreting or other
> complications that would arise.
Given that python HATE bare-except (and `pass`-block bare excep
