On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:47:26 +1000, Lie Ryan wrote:
> On 09/18/10 03:53, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> Lie Ryan wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> And even dict-syntax is not perfect for accessing XML file, e.g.:
>>>
>>>
>>> foo
>>> bar
>>>
>>>
>>> should a['b'] be 'foo' or 'bar'?
>>
>> Attribute style acce
On 09/18/10 03:53, Ethan Furman wrote:
> Lie Ryan wrote:
> [snip]
>> And even dict-syntax is not perfect for accessing XML file, e.g.:
>>
>>
>> foo
>> bar
>>
>>
>> should a['b'] be 'foo' or 'bar'?
>
> Attribute style access would also fail in this instance -- how is this
> worked-around?
On Fri, 2010-09-17, James Mills wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:33 AM, moerchendiser2k3
> wrote:
>> I am really sorry, but what are you talking about ? Hmmm, ...I have
>> problems to compile Python on SL, I did not ask anything about
>> "dynamic attribute". I don't get it...
>
> You are subscr
On 17Sep2010 10:53, Ethan Furman wrote:
| Lie Ryan wrote:
| [snip]
| >And even dict-syntax is not perfect for accessing XML file, e.g.:
| >
| >
| >foo
| >bar
| >
| >
| >should a['b'] be 'foo' or 'bar'?
|
| Attribute style access would also fail in this instance -- how is
| this worked-aro
Lie Ryan wrote:
[snip]
And even dict-syntax is not perfect for accessing XML file, e.g.:
foo
bar
should a['b'] be 'foo' or 'bar'?
Attribute style access would also fail in this instance -- how is this
worked-around?
--
~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-lis
On 09/17/10 07:46, John Nagle wrote:
>There's a tendency to use "dynamic attributes" in Python when
> trying to encapsulate objects from other systems. It almost
> works. But it's usually a headache in the end, and should be
> discouraged. Here's why.
I personally love them, they makes XML
On 9/16/2010 5:46 PM, John Nagle wrote:
By mistakenly posted this as a response to "compile Py2.6 on SL", you
1) confused the OP and
2) limited it audience -- I agree with your points, but would have
missed this if I had had threads collapsed, as I usually do, since I
have no interest in 2.6 co
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 11:33 AM, moerchendiser2k3
wrote:
> I am really sorry, but what are you talking about ? Hmmm, ...I have
> problems to compile Python on SL, I did not ask anything about
> "dynamic attribute". I don't get it...
You are subscribed to the python mailing list.
Check your subs
I am really sorry, but what are you talking about ? Hmmm, ...I have
problems to compile Python on SL, I did not ask anything about
"dynamic attribute". I don't get it...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:27 AM, MRAB wrote:
> For the work on updating the re module there was a discussion about
> whether named capture groups should be available as attributes of the
> match object or via subscripting (or both?). Subscripting seemed
> preferable to me because:
>
> 1. Adding at
On 16/09/2010 22:46, John Nagle wrote:
There's a tendency to use "dynamic attributes" in Python when
trying to encapsulate objects from other systems. It almost
works. But it's usually a headache in the end, and should be
discouraged. Here's why.
Some parsers, like BeautifulSoup, try to encaps
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 7:46 AM, John Nagle wrote:
> There's a tendency to use "dynamic attributes" in Python when
> trying to encapsulate objects from other systems. It almost
> works. But it's usually a headache in the end, and should be
> discouraged. Here's why.
What do you mean by "dynam
There's a tendency to use "dynamic attributes" in Python when
trying to encapsulate objects from other systems. It almost
works. But it's usually a headache in the end, and should be
discouraged. Here's why.
Some parsers, like BeautifulSoup, try to encapsulate HTML tag
fields as Python a
13 matches
Mail list logo
