On Jan 16, 1:55 am, Terry Reedy wrote:
> > Maybe I'm misunderstanding something here, but "About Idle" in Python
> > 2.6.1 (win32) says "Tk version: 8.5"
As to Tk, i was referring to Themes. I may have the versions mixed up
but the newest TK supports themes and i would love to get that support
i
Tim H wrote:
r wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:43 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
OFF-TOPIC:(but related)
What is the state of Tkinter at this point. Is an active effort under
way to port TK 8.5 into Python? Tkinter and IDLE are very important to
Python, but i understand there are much more important areas where
r wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:43 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
[snip]
I think the 'main' IDLE maintainer is no longer active. I think someone
who would do more than fix critical bugs might be welcome.
Hello Terry,
That's what i was beginning to think. I am not quite ready (as far as
my skills are concerned
r wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:43 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
[snip]
I think the 'main' IDLE maintainer is no longer active. I think someone
who would do more than fix critical bugs might be welcome.
Hello Terry,
That's what i was beginning to think. I am not quite ready (as far as
my skills are concerned
On Jan 14, 4:43 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
[snip]
> I think the 'main' IDLE maintainer is no longer active. I think someone
> who would do more than fix critical bugs might be welcome.
Hello Terry,
That's what i was beginning to think. I am not quite ready (as far as
my skills are concerned) to put
James Stroud wrote:
r wrote:
I actually like the IDLE, but it could use a few improvements. If
anybody else has suggestions by all means post them.
1.) The text widget and the prompt(>>>) should be separated. Trying to
write a conditional in the interactive IDLE is a real PITA. Not to
mention i
Hello James,
I actually want to trash IDLE and start over. I would be willing to do
a complete re-write. I have already made a template GUI that works
(early stages). I am wondering if anyone else might be interested in
taking this on with me? IMO IDLE is full of fluff where it should not
be, and t
r wrote:
I actually like the IDLE, but it could use a few improvements. If
anybody else has suggestions by all means post them.
1.) The text widget and the prompt(>>>) should be separated. Trying to
write a conditional in the interactive IDLE is a real PITA. Not to
mention if you copy the workin
I actually like the IDLE, but it could use a few improvements. If
anybody else has suggestions by all means post them.
1.) The text widget and the prompt(>>>) should be separated. Trying to
write a conditional in the interactive IDLE is a real PITA. Not to
mention if you copy the working code snip
