On 3/26/2012 11:27, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
Kiuhnm wrote:
[snip]
numbers - push - avrg - 'med' - pop - filter(lt('med'), ge('med'))\
- ['same', 'same'] - streams(cat) - 'same'
It reads as
"take a list of numbers - save it - compute the average and named it
'med' - restore the flow - crea
Kiuhnm wrote:
[snip]
numbers - push - avrg - 'med' - pop - filter(lt('med'), ge('med'))\
- ['same', 'same'] - streams(cat) - 'same'
It reads as
"take a list of numbers - save it - compute the average and named it
'med' - restore the flow - create two streams which have, respect.,
the num
On 3/24/2012 4:23, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:00:23 +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
I've been writing a little library for handling streams as an excuse for
doing a little OOP with Python.
I don't share some of the views on readability expressed on this ng.
Indeed, I believe that a pie
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:00:23 +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
> I've been writing a little library for handling streams as an excuse for
> doing a little OOP with Python.
>
> I don't share some of the views on readability expressed on this ng.
> Indeed, I believe that a piece of code may very well start as c
On 3/24/2012 0:32, Ray Song wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 05:00:23PM +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
I've been writing a little library for handling streams as an excuse for
doing a little OOP with Python.
I don't share some of the views on readability expressed on this ng.
Indeed, I believe that a piece
On 3/23/2012 22:18, Nathan Rice wrote:
I understand what
you're trying to communicate, so I think you need to be a little more
strict and explicit in your definitions.
No, I don't think you understand what I meant.
I don't agree. Sorry.
You could just point out those inconsistencies that
;t read *everything*, but I do read quite a bit -- especially the
stuff that looks like it might be interesting... like "stream
programming", for example. ;)
After the discussion I've seen so far, I still have no idea how I would
use your code or what it's good for.
The idea
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 05:00:23PM +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
> I've been writing a little library for handling streams as an excuse for
> doing a little OOP with Python.
>
> I don't share some of the views on readability expressed on this ng.
> Indeed, I believe that a piece of code may very well start
types that use
Python. I've seen occasional discussion of functional programming, but
I've only seen anything this confusing maybe twice before... granted, I
don't read *everything*, but I do read quite a bit -- especially the
stuff that looks like it might be interesting...
>> I understand what
>> you're trying to communicate, so I think you need to be a little more
>> strict and explicit in your definitions.
>
>
> No, I don't think you understand what I meant.
I don't agree. Sorry.
> Yes. I thought that streams as an alternative to functional programming were
> wi
On 3/23/2012 20:23, Nathan Rice wrote:
I will use "<=>" to mean "is equivalent to". That's not part of the DSL.
A flow has one or more streams:
1 stream:
[1,2,3]
2 streams:
[1,3,5] | [2,4,6]
Two flows can be concatenated:
[1,2,3] + [4,5,6]<=>[1,2,3,4,5,6]
[0] + ([1
On 3/23/2012 17:33, Nathan Rice wrote:
I will use "<=>" to mean "is equivalent to". That's not part of the DSL.
A flow has one or more streams:
1 stream:
[1,2,3]
2 streams:
[1,3,5] | [2,4,6]
Two flows can be concatenated:
[1,2,3] + [4,5,6]<=> [1,2,3,4,5,6]
[0] + ([1,2] | [3,4]) +
>>> I will use "<=>" to mean "is equivalent to". That's not part of the DSL.
>>> A flow has one or more streams:
>>> 1 stream:
>>> [1,2,3]
>>> 2 streams:
>>> [1,3,5] | [2,4,6]
>>> Two flows can be concatenated:
>>> [1,2,3] + [4,5,6]<=> [1,2,3,4,5,6]
>>> [0] + ([1,2] | [3,4]) + [
On 23/03/2012 16:33, Nathan Rice wrote:
I will use "<=>" to mean "is equivalent to". That's not part of the DSL.
A flow has one or more streams:
1 stream:
[1,2,3]
2 streams:
[1,3,5] | [2,4,6]
Two flows can be concatenated:
[1,2,3] + [4,5,6]<=> [1,2,3,4,5,6]
[0] + ([1,2]
> I will use "<=>" to mean "is equivalent to". That's not part of the DSL.
> A flow has one or more streams:
> 1 stream:
> [1,2,3]
> 2 streams:
> [1,3,5] | [2,4,6]
> Two flows can be concatenated:
> [1,2,3] + [4,5,6] <=> [1,2,3,4,5,6]
> [0] + ([1,2] | [3,4]) + [10] <=> [0,1,2,10] | [0,3,4
On 3/23/2012 17:00, Kiuhnm wrote:
I've been writing a little library for handling streams as an excuse for
doing a little OOP with Python.
I don't share some of the views on readability expressed on this ng.
Indeed, I believe that a piece of code may very well start as complete
gibberish and bec
I've been writing a little library for handling streams as an excuse for
doing a little OOP with Python.
I don't share some of the views on readability expressed on this ng.
Indeed, I believe that a piece of code may very well start as complete
gibberish and become a pleasure to read after som
17 matches
Mail list logo
