>
> If you like, but I tend to interpret "meta-" as idempotent. It's easier on
> my aspirin budget.
>
> --
> Robert Kern
And here I thought it was little blue pills for idempotentcy...
Life is a sexually transmitted disease with a 100% fatality rate. -- brazzy
Auburn fans are like slinkys
On 2010-02-23 22:09 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2010-02-24, Robert Kern wrote:
comp.lang.python.spam_prevention_discussion
Which doesn't exist and never will. Sorry, but
meta-discussions about the group are typically on-topic for
all groups with some few exceptions (e.g. non-discussion,
bin
On 2010-02-24, Robert Kern wrote:
>> comp.lang.python.spam_prevention_discussion
>
> Which doesn't exist and never will. Sorry, but
> meta-discussions about the group are typically on-topic for
> all groups with some few exceptions (e.g. non-discussion,
> binary-only groups with associated .d gr
On 2010-02-23 20:22 , Lie Ryan wrote:
On 02/24/10 12:38, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:06:09 +0100, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
Hmm. I wonder if all the spam is coming from the NG side. I'll have
to look at that. One of the reasons that I stopped reading UseNet over
ten years a
On 02/24/10 12:38, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:06:09 +0100, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
>
>>> Hmm. I wonder if all the spam is coming from the NG side. I'll have
>>> to look at that. One of the reasons that I stopped reading UseNet over
>>> ten years ago was because of the dimi
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:06:09 +0100, Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
>> Hmm. I wonder if all the spam is coming from the NG side. I'll have
>> to look at that. One of the reasons that I stopped reading UseNet over
>> ten years ago was because of the diminishinig S/N ratio. I have always
>> felt that i
On 02/24/10 11:21, Aahz wrote:
> In article ,
> D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:54:25 -0800 (PST)
>> Joan Miller wrote:
>>>
>>> *Sorry by this message off topic, but this is too important*
>>
>> Is it just me or has the spew from gmail on this list radically
>> increased in the
In article ,
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:54:25 -0800 (PST)
>Joan Miller wrote:
>>
>> *Sorry by this message off topic, but this is too important*
>
>Is it just me or has the spew from gmail on this list radically
>increased in the last week? Anyone else considering blocking a
In article <20100223182923.4d259d12.da...@druid.net>,
"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" wrote:
> And just to bring this back on topic, I did do a test and found that
> splitting my mailbox between Python mailing list messages and Python
> newsgroup messages did not indicate that that was a good barometer of
> s
this image is appropriate:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_pS7sKjlzwFg/SwhG1S901pI/Eiw/XSm93RIY2WE/s400/kelso-burn.jpg
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Daniel Fetchinson <
fetchin...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Is it just me or has the spew from gmail on this list radically
> >> >> increase
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:06:09 +0100
Daniel Fetchinson wrote:
> And this has to do with python programming in what way?
Are you new? Meta discussions about lists are generally considered
on-topic for the list.
> You, sir, are incredibly funny :)
Yes, I am. That however is NOT on topic. :-)
An
>> >> Is it just me or has the spew from gmail on this list radically
>> >> increased in the last week? Anyone else considering blocking all gmail
>> >> posts to this list?
>> >
>> > I did that a long time ago for all of the Usenet groups I read
>> > and all but one of the mailing lists I read.
>>
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:31:12 + (UTC)
Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> Is it just me or has the spew from gmail on this list radically
> >> increased in the last week? Anyone else considering blocking all gmail
> >> posts to this list?
> >
> > I did that a long time ago for all of the Usenet groups I
On 2010-02-23, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2010-02-23, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:54:25 -0800 (PST)
>> Joan Miller wrote:
>>> *Sorry by this message off topic, but this is too important*
>>
>> Is it just me or has the spew from gmail on this list radically
>> increased in th
On 2010-02-23, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:54:25 -0800 (PST)
> Joan Miller wrote:
>> *Sorry by this message off topic, but this is too important*
>
> Is it just me or has the spew from gmail on this list radically
> increased in the last week? Anyone else considering blockin
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 02:54:25 -0800 (PST)
Joan Miller wrote:
> *Sorry by this message off topic, but this is too important*
Is it just me or has the spew from gmail on this list radically
increased in the last week? Anyone else considering blocking all gmail
posts to this list?
--
D'Arcy J.M. C
16 matches
Mail list logo
