John Nagle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sockets and pipes are a terrible way to do local interprocess
> communication, but it's what we've got. The problem is that what you
> want is a subroutine call, but what the OS gives you is an I/O operation.
Using TCP sockets is ridiculous but Unix d
Richard Brodie wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>Seems like sockets are about 6 times faster on OpenSUSE than on
>>Windows XP in Python.
>>
>>http://pyfanatic.blogspot.com/2007/02/socket-performance.html
>>
>>Is this related to Python or the OS?
>
>
> It
On Feb 26, 7:05 am, "Paul Boddie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26 Feb, 15:54, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Seems like sockets are about 6 times faster on OpenSUSE than on
> > Windows XP in Python.
>
> >http://pyfanatic.blogspot.com/2007/02/socket-performance.html
>
> > Is
On 26 Feb, 15:54, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems like sockets are about 6 times faster on OpenSUSE than on
> Windows XP in Python.
>
> http://pyfanatic.blogspot.com/2007/02/socket-performance.html
>
> Is this related to Python or the OS?
>From the output:
> TCP window size
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Seems like sockets are about 6 times faster on OpenSUSE than on
> Windows XP in Python.
>
> http://pyfanatic.blogspot.com/2007/02/socket-performance.html
>
> Is this related to Python or the OS?
It's 6 times faster even when not using
Seems like sockets are about 6 times faster on OpenSUSE than on
Windows XP in Python.
http://pyfanatic.blogspot.com/2007/02/socket-performance.html
Is this related to Python or the OS?
/MSkou
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
The machines with the 100mbps ethernet link are slightly
different---Pentium 4, 2.8GHz, Python 2.2, RedHat 9.
File size: 87490278
Best of 4 runs: 7.50 MB/s reported by "wget".
There was other network activity and system load at the time.
Jeff
pgpNVPeW3ghJL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
h
Would you care to do that between two machines on a 100mb link ?
On 6/5/05, Jeff Epler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 300KB/s sounds dreadfully low.
>
> I simply ran "python /usr/lib/python2.3/SimpleHTTPServer.py &", then
> "wget -O /dev/null http://0.0.0.0:8000/70megfile";. On the best of 4
> run
Hi Jeff
Would you care to do that between two machines on a 100mb link ?
M
On 6/5/05, Jeff Epler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 300KB/s sounds dreadfully low.
>
> I simply ran "python /usr/lib/python2.3/SimpleHTTPServer.py &", then
> "wget -O /dev/null http://0.0.0.0:8000/70megfile";. On the bes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I'm busy writing a python p2p program and would like some advice.
>
> I'm pushing about 300k/s and would like to know if there are any python
> tricks I could pull to speed things up. I'm thinking about unrolling
> some of the loops and recuding calls to my c
300KB/s sounds dreadfully low.
I simply ran "python /usr/lib/python2.3/SimpleHTTPServer.py &", then
"wget -O /dev/null http://0.0.0.0:8000/70megfile";. On the best of 4
runs (when the file was cached) wget measured 225.20MB/s.
The hardware is a Pentium-M laptop with 768MB RAM runnng at 1.5GHz.
Hi All
I'm busy writing a python p2p program and would like some advice.
I'm pushing about 300k/s and would like to know if there are any python
tricks I could pull to speed things up. I'm thinking about unrolling
some of the loops and recuding calls to my custom socket class and
just calling rec
12 matches
Mail list logo