Am 04.08.2011 10:42 schrieb Chris Rebert:
I was considering the more general case where one of the strings may
have come from user input. You then need to also escape
$looks_like_a_var, `some_command`, and way more other such stuff that
your simple function doesn't cover.
Even these things are
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Thomas Rachel
wrote:
> Am 03.08.2011 19:27 schrieb Chris Rebert:
>
>>> shell= True,
>>
>> I would strongly encourage you to avoid shell=True.
>
> ACK, but not because it is hard, but because it is unnecessary and unelegant
> at this point.
>
>> Y
Am 03.08.2011 17:29 schrieb Phlip:
Groupies:
This is either a code snippet, if you like it, or a request for a
critique, if you don't.
Well, at first, I cannot see the real point about it...
def command(*cmdz):
process = Popen( flatten(cmdz),
shell= True,
Am 03.08.2011 19:27 schrieb Chris Rebert:
shell= True,
I would strongly encourage you to avoid shell=True.
ACK, but not because it is hard, but because it is unnecessary and
unelegant at this point.
You really don't want to have to worry about doing proper shell esca
On 8/3/2011 11:29 AM, Phlip wrote:
This is either a code snippet, if you like it, or a request for a
critique, if you don't.
A learning exercise but pretty useless otherwise. As others pointed out,
immediately stripping off \n is a bug relative to *your* function
description. Also, you yours
> flatten() being defined as...?
Python Cookbook recipe 4.6
def flatten(sequence): # CONSIDER: Reconcile with utils...
for item in sequence:
if isinstance(item, (list, tuple)):
for subitem in flatten(list(item)):
yield subitem
else:
y
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Phlip wrote:
> Groupies:
>
> This is either a code snippet, if you like it, or a request for a
> critique, if you don't.
>
> I want to call a command and then treat the communication with that
> command as an object. And I want to do it as application-specifically
>
On 03/08/11 17:29, Phlip wrote:
> Groupies:
>
> This is either a code snippet, if you like it, or a request for a
> critique, if you don't.
>
> I want to call a command and then treat the communication with that
> command as an object. And I want to do it as application-specifically
> as possible
Phlip wrote:
> Groupies:
I smell a slight misperception of the audience you are addressing ;)
> This is either a code snippet, if you like it, or a request for a
> critique, if you don't.
>
> I want to call a command and then treat the communication with that
> command as an object. And I want
