On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:25:20 -0500, Jack Diederich wrote:
> It is a built-in module so it doesn't have a .so (dll) or .py file
> to mention.
Wouldn't it make sense for module.__file__ to be set to None rather than
completely missing in this case?
--
Steven.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/
"mh" wrote:
> So on most modules I import, I can access the .__file__ attribute to
> find the implementation. ie:
> >>> import time
> >>> time.__file__
> '/data1/virtualpython/lib/python2.3/lib-dynload/timemodule.so'
> >>> import socket
> >>> socket.__file__
> '/data1/virtualpython/lib/python2.3/
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 02:04:45PM -0800, mh wrote:
> So on most modules I import, I can access the .__file__ attribute to
> find the implementation. ie:
> >>> import time
> >>> time.__file__
> '/data1/virtualpython/lib/python2.3/lib-dynload/timemodule.so'
> >>> import socket
> >>> socket.__file__
So on most modules I import, I can access the .__file__ attribute to
find the implementation. ie:
>>> import time
>>> time.__file__
'/data1/virtualpython/lib/python2.3/lib-dynload/timemodule.so'
>>> import socket
>>> socket.__file__
'/data1/virtualpython/lib/python2.3/socket.pyc'
This doesn't wor
