cyberco wrote:
> PIL is certainly a fine option, but I noticed that the scaled images
> (scaled with the ANTIALIAS filter) are not as good as you can get with,
> say, Photoshop. Maybe I'm just expecting too much, but I wish I could
> choose a higher quality rescaling algorithm. PIL still rocks thou
PIL is certainly a fine option, but I noticed that the scaled images
(scaled with the ANTIALIAS filter) are not as good as you can get with,
say, Photoshop. Maybe I'm just expecting too much, but I wish I could
choose a higher quality rescaling algorithm. PIL still rocks though.
On Dec 28, 2:32 pm
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:53:41 +0100, Kajsa Anka wrote
(in article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
Thanks for the answers, I'll use PIL.
jem
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Kajsa Anka:
> I found the Python Imaging Library but before I dive into that I would like
> to know if there is a better way of doing this.
PIL is very fit for that. Note that it creates thumbnails already by
itself, you can use that for bigger images too.
Bye,
bearophile
--
http://mail.python.
Kajsa Anka wrote:
> I would like some advice, I'm going to build a small app that will, among
> other things, scale images so that they can be published on a web site. I've
> never done any image processing in python before so I would like to ask what
> is the best way of doing this, I will not do
Kajsa Anka wrote:
> I would like some advice, I'm going to build a small app that will, among
> other things, scale images so that they can be published on a web site. I've
> never done any image processing in python before so I would like to ask what
> is the best way of doing this, I will not do
I would like some advice, I'm going to build a small app that will, among
other things, scale images so that they can be published on a web site. I've
never done any image processing in python before so I would like to ask what
is the best way of doing this, I will not do anything else than scal