Re: SHA1 broken

Irmen de Jong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Also, the new findings only apply to hash collisions, not to the > > invertibility of SHA1 hashes - thus, as Schneier points out, uses of > > keyed hashes (such as HMAC) are not compromised by this. > > What about HMAC-MD5? HMAC-MD5 and HMAC-SHA1 shou

Re: SHA1 broken

Tim Churches wrote: Also, the new findings only apply to hash collisions, not to the invertibility of SHA1 hashes - thus, as Schneier points out, uses of keyed hashes (such as HMAC) are not compromised by this. What about HMAC-MD5? --Irmen -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: SHA1 broken

Paul Rubin wrote: > > FYI. > >From : > > The research team of Xiaoyun Wang, Yiqun Lisa Yin, and Hongbo Yu > (mostly from Shandong University in China) have been quietly > circulating a paper ann

SHA1 broken

FYI. >From : The research team of Xiaoyun Wang, Yiqun Lisa Yin, and Hongbo Yu (mostly from Shandong University in China) have been quietly circulating a paper announcing their results: * collisions in the the full