"Steve Holden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 May 2007 19:47:28 -0700, Huck Phin wrote:
> [a request for peace, love and understanding, concluding with]
> >> We all should be a little more considerate of each other.
> >
> > And if the hippy hug fest fails to s
Steve Holden wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Wed, 02 May 2007 19:47:28 -0700, Huck Phin wrote:
[a request for peace, love and understanding, concluding with]
We all should be a little more considerate of each other.
And if the hippy hug fest fails to stop spamming, perhaps
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 02 May 2007 19:47:28 -0700, Huck Phin wrote:
[a request for peace, love and understanding, concluding with]
>> We all should be a little more considerate of each other.
>
> And if the hippy hug fest fails to stop spamming, perhaps we'll be allowed
> to hunt them do
On Wed, 02 May 2007 19:47:28 -0700, Huck Phin wrote:
> I understand how top posting is annoying, and when you check any
> usenet group message, everyone seems to just jump at the chance to
> yell at someone for doing it. What I do not understand is how
> everyone is attacking the top poster, and
I understand how top posting is annoying, and when you check any
usenet group message, everyone seems to just jump at the chance to
yell at someone for doing it. What I do not understand is how
everyone is attacking the top poster, and not the spammer. It seems
that the real issue of this post is
En Tue, 01 May 2007 16:23:44 -0300, Bob Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> That is the oft-quoted, idiotic type of example. The reality is that if
> we
> follow the thread, we know the question, we only want to see the answer,
> not
> wade through a morass of stuff we have already seen
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> You bottom posters really are a bunch of supercilious, self-righteous
> bigots.
>
> Personally, I find bottom-posting like reading a book backwards ... it
> doesn't work for me.
>
> And regardless of his response, Mr Bruney IS an MVP,
Bob Phillips wrote:
> That is the oft-quoted, idiotic type of example. The reality is that if we
> follow the thread, we know the question, we only want to see the answer, not
> wade through a morass of stuff we have already seen. If we haven't seen it,
> guess what, we can go and read it.
!tuo
That is the oft-quoted, idiotic type of example. The reality is that if we
follow the thread, we know the question, we only want to see the answer, not
wade through a morass of stuff we have already seen. If we haven't seen it,
guess what, we can go and read it.
"funfly3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David wrote:
> I am not going to join the argument,
except you have
except to say that as you can see, I
> top post. In outlook express, you can see the messages as a thread, so you
> read the initial message, come to the reply and you read the response
> without having to scroll. Bottom postin
I am not going to join the argument, except to say that as you can see, I
top post. In outlook express, you can see the messages as a thread, so you
read the initial message, come to the reply and you read the response
without having to scroll. Bottom posting would be fine if the previous
messa
Bob Phillips wrote:
> You bottom posters really are a bunch of supercilious, self-righteous
> bigots.
Whatever. When reading answers to some statements normal people like first
to see the statement then the response, not the other way around. Just
because you're using broken tool (Outlook Expre
You bottom posters really are a bunch of supercilious, self-righteous
bigots.
Personally, I find bottom-posting like reading a book backwards ... it
doesn't work for me.
And regardless of his response, Mr Bruney IS an MVP, he is clearly
knowledgeable in his subject, and his book is well enough
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 20:55:11 -0400, [Juan T. Llibre] said :-
>re:
>!>>>Top posting
>!>> Did not. I replied to the message at the bottom of the thread.
>!> Congratulations, you've now made a fool of yourself in public.
>
>OK, cut it out.
>
>Top or bottom posting is a user choice.
>No need to flame
"Juan T. Llibre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Top or bottom posting is a user choice.
Yes, one can choose to be polite and follow established usenet
conventions, or one can choose to be rude and self-centered.
Those who choose rudeness over courtesy can expect to be called down
for it - which i
re:
!>>>Top posting
!>> Did not. I replied to the message at the bottom of the thread.
!> Congratulations, you've now made a fool of yourself in public.
OK, cut it out.
Top or bottom posting is a user choice.
No need to flame someone for using either.
Juan T. Llibre, asp.net MVP
asp.net faq :
"Alvin Bruney [MVP]" writes:
>>Top posting
> Did not. I replied to the message at the bottom of the thread.
Congratulations, you've now made a fool of yourself in public.
Top posting has nothing to do with where your reply is placed with
respect to other messages. Top posting is when you add yo
>Top posting
Did not. I replied to the message at the bottom of the thread.
>Call yourself an MVP, that's a joke Slick.
Yup, I do call myself an MVP, it's not a joke either.
--
Regards,
Alvin Bruney
--
Shameless author plug
Excel Services for .
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:21:39 -0400, ["Alvin Bruney [MVP]" ] said :-
>Please don't spam this group
Top posting and without removing the spamvertised site, you are as bad
as the spammer. Call yourself an MVP, that's a joke Slick.
Indeed the spam was not even seen by probably many servers until you
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Alvin Bruney [MVP]" says...
> Please don't spam this group
>
A top-poster replies to a spammer. Now that world has truly gone mad(!)
--
Dom Robinson Gamertag: DVDfever email: dom at dvdfever dot co dot uk
/* http://DVDfever.co.uk (editor)
/* 1132 DVDs,
Please don't spam this group
--
Regards,
Alvin Bruney
--
Shameless author plug
Excel Services for .NET is coming...
OWC Black book on Amazon and
www.lulu.com/owc
Professional VSTO 2005 - Wrox/Wiley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[E
Free Seo Consulting http://seo-optimizer.blogspot.com/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
22 matches
Mail list logo
