MI5 Persecution. Update: Friday 31 March, 2000
22,544 Faxes Delivered in Three Years, and Still No. Breakthrough
In the last three. years I have sent at least 22,544 faxes to recipients in
the UK, of. which at least 13,974 have gone to Westminster. Last weekend
alone I sent 832 completed faxes t
MI5 Want Me to Send You these. Faxes
MI5. seem to Want to Spin this Business out for as Long as Possible
The MI5 persecution has. now been going on, starting from June 1990, for
well over nine years. If I. knew how to put an end to it then I would do
so. Of course MI5 have indicated how they wi
> nah, if you've spent more than five minutes on c.l.python lately, you'd
> noticed that it's the Solution to Everything (up there with pyparsing, I
> think).
SE would be the Solution to Everything.
pyparsing Provides Your Perfect Alternative where Regexp Syntax
Is N
ff
> also for things for which there are simple and efficient solutions
> available in Python's standard library, your behavior could be seen
> as more than just a nuisance.
>
>
>
>
Thank you for making me aware of it. I totally agree with you that
inefficient complexi
Frederic Rentsch wrote:
> And here's the proof I am being perceived as a nuisance. I apologize,
> keeping to myself that I don't care.
since you're constantly targeting newbies, and are hawking your stuff
also for things for which there are simple and efficient solutions
available in Python's
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Gary Herron wrote:
>
>
>> As a matter of polite netiquette, a message like this really ought to
>> have a paragraph telling us what SE *is*.(Unless it's a secret :-))
>>
>
> nah, if you've spent more than five minutes
jim-on-linux wrote:
> On Friday 03 November 2006 08:21, Steve Holden
> wrote:
>
>>Frederic Rentsch wrote:
>>
>>>jim-on-linux wrote:
>>>
Frederic,
I've been trying to get back into my package
in the Cheese Shop for over a year. The
phone company changed my e:mail address and
>
h a very low statistical probability. Version 2.3 has
>> this fixed.
>>
>>Download URL: http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/SE/2.3
>>
>>
> As a matter of polite netiquette, a message like this really ought to
> have a paragraph telling us what SE *is*
C or L Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm evaluating different methods of handling a transliteration (from an
> ascii-based representation of the devanagari/indian script to a romanized
> representation). I found SE and have been working with it today. One thing
> that I ran i
Gary Herron wrote:
> As a matter of polite netiquette, a message like this really ought to
> have a paragraph telling us what SE *is*.(Unless it's a secret :-))
nah, if you've spent more than five minutes on c.l.python lately, you'd
noticed that it's the Soluti
s
> this fixed.
>
>Download URL: http://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/SE/2.3
>
As a matter of polite netiquette, a message like this really ought to
have a paragraph telling us what SE *is*.(Unless it's a secret :-))
> A list of possible handling improvements is being mad
On Friday 03 November 2006 08:21, Steve Holden
wrote:
> Frederic Rentsch wrote:
> > jim-on-linux wrote:
> >>Frederic,
> >>
> >>I've been trying to get back into my package
> >> in the Cheese Shop for over a year. The
> >> phone company changed my e:mail address and
> >> to make a long and frustrat
On Thursday 02 November 2006 14:59, Frederic
Rentsch wrote:
> jim-on-linux wrote:
> > Frederic,
> >
> > I've been trying to get back into my package
> > in the Cheese Shop for over a year. The phone
> > company changed my e:mail address and to make
> > a long and frustrating story short I can't
>
Frederic Rentsch wrote:
> jim-on-linux wrote:
>
>>Frederic,
>>
>>I've been trying to get back into my package in
>>the Cheese Shop for over a year. The phone
>>company changed my e:mail address and to make a
>>long and frustrating story short I can't get back
>>into the Cheese Shop to make cha
://cheeseshop.python.org/pypi/SE/2.3
A list of possible handling improvements is being made to be
incorporated in the next version, One major flaw of the interface design
came to light the other day when a user reported a non-functioning
Editor Object made with a file name. If the constructor cannot find the
jim-on-linux wrote:
> Frederic,
>
> I've been trying to get back into my package in
> the Cheese Shop for over a year. The phone
> company changed my e:mail address and to make a
> long and frustrating story short I can't get back
> into the Cheese Shop to make changes to my file.
>
> Time is m
nd the
> thought that someone might show up there and
> not find the promised goods make me really
> unhappy. Until such time as this upload is
> made, I will be happy to send SE-2.3 out off
> list by request.
>
> Infinite thanks
>
> Frederic
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
this upload is made, I will be happy to send
SE-2.3 out off list by request.
Infinite thanks
Frederic
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
gust 25, 2006 8:25
PM
Subject: SE 2.2 install
Hi,Thanks for your help on the news group..I'm having trouble installing SE, when I run python SETUP.PY install I get:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Desktop/SE-2.2$ python SETUP.PY installrunning installrunning build
running build_pyfile SEL.py (for modul
at the bottom rather fast. If it's gone by the
> time you check, type SE into the search template in the upper right corner.
Thanks, but I know how to use the Cheese Shop.
Last time I looked, there was no file available for download. Now it is.
Georg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
by the
time you check, type SE into the search template in the upper right corner.
Frederic
- Original Message -
From: "Georg Brandl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: Ann: SE 2.2b
> [EMAIL PROTECTE
(Environment: RedHat Linux recent, Python 2.3.5)
We have a batch processing script that on occasion needs to send out an
email. We have a sendmail running locally.
Sometimes we get a socket timeout on sending that email. Increasing the
timeout to 30sec reduced but did not eliminate it.
It seems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Frederic> In the short period of time since I introduced SE. the
> Frederic> feedback has been overwhelmingly postive.
>
> Ummm... what is it? The last SE I had was a Mac.
It is supposed to be a Stream Editor (in the spirit of sed, I think).
Frederic> In the short period of time since I introduced SE. the
Frederic> feedback has been overwhelmingly postive.
Ummm... what is it? The last SE I had was a Mac.
Skip
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
HJi all,
In the short period of time since I introduced SE. the feedback has been
overwhelmingly postive. Thank you all! I am still cleaning
up minor functional imperfections as I encounter them working out solutions to
posted problems. So the other day I discovered that
version 2.1 failed to
Sullivan WxPyQtKinter wrote:
> I am sorry but you misunderstood my idea.
> What I want is a generalized method to print out the function name, or
> refer to the name of a function. If I use f.__name__, I think I should
> just use print "f" to save my keyboard. What I expect is using a
> method, or
Sullivan WxPyQtKinter wrote:
> I am sorry but you misunderstood my idea.
> What I want is a generalized method to print out the function name, or
> refer to the name of a function. If I use f.__name__, I think I should
> just use print "f" to save my keyboard. What I expect is using a
> method, or
Sullivan WxPyQtKinter wrote:
If I would like to refer to the function object in order
> to call it recursively, what shall I do then?
I think the question is too simple. You can just refer to the function
by its name. Here is an example:
py> def f(start, end):
... if start >= end:
... pri
ion to get the name of a
function.
Kay Schluehr 写道：
> Sullivan WxPyQtKinter wrote:
>
> > So how
> > could I refer to the function object per se, in the body of the
> > function itself?
>
> Just use the name.
>
> def f():
> print f.__name__
>
> &
Sullivan WxPyQtKinter wrote:
> So how
> could I refer to the function object per se, in the body of the
> function itself?
Just use the name.
def f():
print f.__name__
>>> f()
f
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Sullivan WxPyQtKinter wrote:
> I have Google the whole thing and find another way for alternative
> implementation of getting the function's name. But all they returns are
> just strings. If I would like to refer to the function object in order
> to call it recursively, what shall I do then?
>
a
I have Google the whole thing and find another way for alternative
implementation of getting the function's name. But all they returns are
just strings. If I would like to refer to the function object in order
to call it recursively, what shall I do then?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinf
Sullivan WxPyQtKinter wrote:
> So how
> could I refer to the function object per se, in the body of the
> function itself?
>
>
I don't believe you can easily get at the function object, but you can get
at the code object which also has a name (which will be the same as
that gives its name, but when I
print __name__
in a function, it usually print the public module-level __name__
attribute, ie, 'main', rather than the function level __name__. So how
could I refer to the function object per se, in the body of the
function itself?
--
http://mail.python.
34 matches
Mail list logo
