Re: RotatingFileHandler bugs/errors and a general logging question.

2007-05-10 Thread Vinay Sajip
On May 10, 6:37 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On May 9, 12:37 am, Vinay Sajip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Our biggest concerns with the network solution is having a single > point of failure and the need for scalability. We could have > potentially thousands of machines doingloggingacross multi

Re: RotatingFileHandler bugs/errors and a general logging question.

2007-05-10 Thread nicholas . petrella
On May 9, 12:37 am, Vinay Sajip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 9, 12:52 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> The infrastructure in which I > am work needs the ability to have log > > files written to from multiple instances of the same script and > > potentially from hundreds or more different machi

Re: RotatingFileHandler bugs/errors and a general logging question.

2007-05-09 Thread Vinay Sajip
On May 9, 12:52 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The infrastructure in which I am work needs the ability to have log > files written to from multiple instances of the same script and > potentially from hundreds or more different machines. > > I know that the documentation suggests using a networklogg

RotatingFileHandler bugs/errors and a general logging question.

2007-05-08 Thread nicholas . petrella
I am currently trying to use the python logging system as a core enterprise level logging solution for our development and production environments. The rotating file handler seems to be what I am looking for as I want the ability to have control over the number and size of log files that are writt