In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Paul Boddie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I personally don't believe very strongly in this server-side
>serialisation of various non-displayable formats for potentially large
>amounts of client-side code to unpack, process, stuff into different
>places, and so on. As
bruno at modulix wrote:
> Adrian, what you describe here is *exactly* what I call "no Ajax
> support": you have to handle the whole thing manually, the framework
> doesn't provide anything by itself. Would you say the CGI module offers
> support for templating, data persistance and Ajax as well ?-)
bruno at modulix wrote:
> Adrian, what you describe here is *exactly* what I call "no Ajax
> support": you have to handle the whole thing manually, the framework
>doesn't provide anything by itself.
I'm not going to argue whether Django supports "Ajax" or not, but I
will agree that for the desired
bruno at modulix wrote:
> Adrian, what you describe here is *exactly* what I call "no Ajax
> support": you have to handle the whole thing manually, the framework
>doesn't provide anything by itself.
I'm not going to argue whether Django supports "Ajax" or not, but I
will agree that for the desired
bruno at modulix wrote:
> Adrian, what you describe here is *exactly* what I call "no Ajax
> support": you have to handle the whole thing manually, the framework
>doesn't provide anything by itself.
I'm not going to argue whether Django supports "Ajax" or not, but I
will agree that for the desired
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>
>>RoR is not an IDE, it's a web framework. The closest things in Python
>>are TurboGears (good Ajax/js support via Mochikit), Subway (never
>>tested), and Django (no Ajax support AFAIK).
>
>
> Note that "no Ajax support" is misleading. Of course
Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>> RoR is not an IDE, it's a web framework. The closest things in Python
>> are TurboGears (good Ajax/js support via Mochikit), Subway (never
>> tested), and Django (no Ajax support AFAIK).
>
> Note that "no Ajax support" is misleading. Of course yo
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Adrian Holovaty wrote:
> bruno at modulix wrote:
>> RoR is not an IDE, it's a web framework. The closest things in Python
>> are TurboGears (good Ajax/js support via Mochikit), Subway (never
>> tested), and Django (no Ajax support AFAIK).
>
> Note that "no Ajax support" is mi
bruno at modulix wrote:
> RoR is not an IDE, it's a web framework. The closest things in Python
> are TurboGears (good Ajax/js support via Mochikit), Subway (never
> tested), and Django (no Ajax support AFAIK).
Note that "no Ajax support" is misleading. Of course you can use Ajax
with Django, just
Yechezkal Gutfreund wrote:
> Are you familiar with any Python efforts that parrallel Ruby on Rails
> (integrated Ajax compliant IDE?).
"integrated" and "IDE" in the same sentence ? A bit redundant, isn't it ?-)
RoR is not an IDE, it's a web framework. The closest things in Python
are TurboGears (
10 matches
Mail list logo