Re: Request for recommendations: shared database without a server

2006-10-06 Thread Paul Boddie
EP wrote: > [Client-only application with shared storage and concurrent access] > Can I get there with MySQL? Or do I need to pair a pure python > approach (including the database) with py2exe? Has anyone achieved > this with a db framework like Dabo? Or is there another, entirely > different

Re: Request for recommendations: shared database without a server

2006-10-05 Thread EP
Larry Bates wrote: > So what is going to be holding the "network drive" if it isn't a server? > And what is MySQL running on? The network drives are on a filer (a NAS array, I believe). The filer will not execute any code, it just serves data by whatever protocols (example: CIFS, NFS) it is set

Re: Request for recommendations: shared database without a server

2006-10-05 Thread Larry Bates
EP wrote: > I need to build a fairly simple application that will reside on remote > storage, not on a server, and I am looking for any best practices and > approaches that have worked for others. I believe py2exe may be part > of the solution. Here's what I need to build: > > -- A database app

Re: Request for recommendations: shared database without a server

2006-10-05 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
Tim Chase schrieb: >> Access might really be the best solution. It is pretty good >> for what it is supposed to do, and the quick prototyping and >> UI-designing are strong arguments for it, especially if there >> already is a bias towards it. >> >> I also _think_ that the whole "db on a shared vol

Re: Request for recommendations: shared database without a server

2006-10-05 Thread Tim Chase
> Access might really be the best solution. It is pretty good > for what it is supposed to do, and the quick prototyping and > UI-designing are strong arguments for it, especially if there > already is a bias towards it. > > I also _think_ that the whole "db on a shared volume" thing > works compa

Re: Request for recommendations: shared database without a server

2006-10-05 Thread Diez B. Roggisch
> -- A database application on a network drive > -- A variety of users will access the database application at various > times > -- All computing is done on the client machines (Windows XP), as there > is no server > -- I'll not be able to install a database program, or Python, on the > client

Request for recommendations: shared database without a server

2006-10-05 Thread EP
I need to build a fairly simple application that will reside on remote storage, not on a server, and I am looking for any best practices and approaches that have worked for others. I believe py2exe may be part of the solution. Here's what I need to build: -- A database application on a network