On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 10:28 am, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> To the controllers of Python-List:
>
> I never asked to be on your list. I never consented to having my postings
> appear on your list. And I certainly didn’t agree to any conditions you
> might impose on members on your list.
comp.lang.
On 11/23/2016 04:31 PM, mm0fmf wrote:
> On 23/11/2016 23:28, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
>> Therefore, to see you take offence at something I said, and use
>> that as an excuse to “ban” me from your list, is an act of
>> breathtaking hypocrisy. As far as I am concerned, it is you lot who
>> should b
On 23/11/2016 23:28, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
To the controllers of Python-List:
I never asked to be on your list. I never consented to having my postings
appear on your list. And I certainly didn’t agree to any conditions you might
impose on members on your list.
Therefore, to see you take
On 12/10/2016 11:15, Peter Otten wrote:
BartC wrote:
On 12/10/2016 05:30, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 11:23:48 AM UTC+13, BartC wrote:
while n>=x:
n=n-1
print "*"* n
else:
print ("2nd loop exit n=",n,"x=",x)
What is the difference between that
BartC wrote:
> On 12/10/2016 05:30, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
>> On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 11:23:48 AM UTC+13, BartC wrote:
>>> while n>=x:
>>> n=n-1
>>> print "*"* n
>>> else:
>>> print ("2nd loop exit n=",n,"x=",x)
>>
>> What is the difference between that and
>>
>> w
On 12/10/2016 05:30, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 11:23:48 AM UTC+13, BartC wrote:
while n>=x:
n=n-1
print "*"* n
else:
print ("2nd loop exit n=",n,"x=",x)
What is the difference between that and
while n>=x:
n=n-1
print "*"*
On 11/10/2016 22:26, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
On Wednesday, October 12, 2016 at 6:58:46 AM UTC+13, dhawan...@gmail.com wrote:
Only first loop is executing not the second one?
n=6
x=1
while x<=n:
print("*"*x)
x+=1
print('n=', n)
"Gregory Ewing" a écrit dans le message de
news:e5mgi9fp1b...@mid.individual.net...
Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
Every function is already a descriptor.
Which you can see with a simple experiment:
>>> def f(self):
... print("self =", self)
...
I thought yesterday that every thing was cle
"Steve D'Aprano" a écrit dans le message de
news:57f6673a$0$1598$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com...
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 08:03 pm, ast wrote:
Consider this function:
def add(a, b):
return a+b
You say that a function is always stored as
a descriptor object, so when I execute
sum = f(4
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016 08:03 pm, ast wrote:
> Consider this function:
>
> def add(a, b):
> return a+b
>
> You say that a function is always stored as
> a descriptor object, so when I execute
>
> sum = f(4, 6)
>
> from which class it is supposed to come from ?
It doesn't. The descriptor proto
ast wrote:
>
> "Lawrence D’Oliveiro" a écrit dans le message de
> news:f5314bdd-a98f-4a16-b546-bd8efe4dd...@googlegroups.com...
>> On Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 7:54:08 PM UTC+13, ast wrote:
>>> But there is no decorator, why ? Is python doing the conversion
>>> of funct2 to a descriptor itsel
"Lawrence D’Oliveiro" a écrit dans le message de
news:f5314bdd-a98f-4a16-b546-bd8efe4dd...@googlegroups.com...
On Thursday, October 6, 2016 at 7:54:08 PM UTC+13, ast wrote:
But there is no decorator, why ? Is python doing the conversion
of funct2 to a descriptor itself, behind the scene ?
E
Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
Every function is already a descriptor.
Which you can see with a simple experiment:
>>> def f(self):
... print("self =", self)
...
>>> g = f.__get__(17, None)
>>> g
>>> g()
self = 17
--
Greg
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
i do not understand,
how to solve this frozonset ?
Lawrence D’Oliveiro於 2016年10月5日星期三 UTC+8下午2時24分13秒寫道：
> On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 2:35:25 PM UTC+13, meInvent bbird wrote:
> > it return unhashable type 'set'
>
> This is what “frozenset” is for--it’s the immutable counterpart of “set”.
yes, i searched in google between 2011 and 2012
descending for loop is faster than ascending for loop
On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 9:48:41 AM UTC+8, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:41 PM, meInvent bbird wrote:
> > so far i do not know which bug i search for
> >
> > i would
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:41 PM, meInvent bbird wrote:
> so far i do not know which bug i search for
>
> i would like to change style of for loop
>
> form ascending to descending style
>
> for(int i=0; i<3; ++i)
>
> to
>
> for(int i=3; i>=0; --i)
>
> or
>
> most crazy to change if else if else int
On Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at 2:34:49 AM UTC+8, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 10:38:14 PM UTC+13, meInvent bbird wrote:
> > how to customize pycparser to search what we want such as bug
>
> What kind of bug do you want to search for?
so far i do not know which bu
17 matches
Mail list logo
