Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread George Sakkis
On Jan 30, 9:27 pm, MRAB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 31, 1:09 am, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On Jan 30, 5:03 > pm, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:29:45 +0100, Wildemar Wildenburger wrote: > > > > Gerardo Herzig wrote: > > >

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread Steven D'Aprano
(Top-posting corrected.) On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:38:30 -0500, Sergio Correia wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 10:30 PM, Ben Finney > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> MRAB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > On Jan 31, 12:57 am, Asun Friere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > Ouch!! If on the other hand 'female

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread Sergio Correia
So in this case it is REALLY better to ask for permission rather than forgiveness? On Jan 30, 2008 10:30 PM, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MRAB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Jan 31, 12:57 am, Asun Friere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ouch!! If on the other hand 'females' is pop

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread Ben Finney
MRAB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Jan 31, 12:57 am, Asun Friere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ouch!! If on the other hand 'females' is populated by instances of > > (or merely includes instances of) class 'Human', I suggest you > > test for female.consent somewhere in your code! > > > The Pyt

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread MRAB
On Jan 31, 1:09 am, George Sakkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 30, 5:03 pm, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:29:45 +0100, Wildemar Wildenburger wrote: > > > Gerardo Herzig wrote: > > >> I will use genital().extend(), thats for shure ^^ > > > >

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread MRAB
On Jan 31, 12:57 am, Asun Friere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 31, 3:13 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Wildemar Wildenburger wrote: > > > Well, you never go wrong with apply(genital(), females), do you? > > Never?! > > class PowerSocket () : > def __init__ (self, plug=fem

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread George Sakkis
On Jan 30, 5:03 pm, Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:29:45 +0100, Wildemar Wildenburger wrote: > > Gerardo Herzig wrote: > >> I will use genital().extend(), thats for shure ^^ > > > Well, you never go wrong with apply(genital(), females), do you? > > `app

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread Asun Friere
On Jan 31, 3:13 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wildemar Wildenburger wrote: > > Well, you never go wrong with apply(genital(), females), do you? Never?! class PowerSocket () : def __init__ (self, plug=female, active=False) : self.plug = plug self.active = active females

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:29:45 +0100, Wildemar Wildenburger wrote: > Gerardo Herzig wrote: >> I will use genital().extend(), thats for shure ^^ > > Well, you never go wrong with apply(genital(), females), do you? `apply()` is deprecated. And ``genital(*females)`` looks a bit odd. :-) Ciao,

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread Steve Holden
Wildemar Wildenburger wrote: > Gerardo Herzig wrote: >> I will use genital().extend(), thats for shure ^^ > > Well, you never go wrong with apply(genital(), females), do you? > > /W That's enough genitalia [ed] -- Steve Holden+1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread Wildemar Wildenburger
Gerardo Herzig wrote: > I will use genital().extend(), thats for shure ^^ Well, you never go wrong with apply(genital(), females), do you? /W -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread Gerardo Herzig
Sion Arrowsmith wrote: >Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:48:38 -0800, Tobiah wrote: >> >> >>>class genital: >>> def pubic_hair(self): >>> pass >>> def remove(self): >>> del(self.pubic_hair) >>> >>> >>I thi

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread Sion Arrowsmith
Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:48:38 -0800, Tobiah wrote: >> class genital: >> def pubic_hair(self): >> pass >> def remove(self): >> del(self.pubic_hair) >I think `pubic_hair` is an attribute instead of a method. > >O

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread Marc 'BlackJack' Rintsch
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:48:38 -0800, Tobiah wrote: > class genital: > > def pubic_hair(self): > pass > > def remove(self): > del(self.pubic_hair) I think `pubic_hair` is an attribute instead of a method. Oh, and ``del`` is a statement and not a function.

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-30 Thread Tobiah
class genital: def pubic_hair(self): pass def remove(self): del(self.pubic_hair) "Removing pubic hair methods" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Shaving is the most common removing pubic hair method. However, it is > not the only one

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-29 Thread John Machin
On Jan 30, 9:14 am, Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Shaving is the most common removing pubic hair method. However, it > > is not the only one. > > Clearly you haven't done the Python tutorial, otherwise you'd realise > there's no distinction between pubic meth

Re: Removing Pubic Hair Methods

2008-01-29 Thread Ben Finney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Shaving is the most common removing pubic hair method. However, it > is not the only one. Clearly you haven't done the Python tutorial, otherwise you'd realise there's no distinction between pubic methods and privy methods. Also, there's one, and preferably only one,