Gabriel Genellina wrote:
> En Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:27:12 -0300, Wojtek Walczak
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
>> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 06:40:35 GMT, OKB (not okblacke) wrote:
>>
Download the latest beta for your system and give it a try.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the advice, but I'd reall
En Sun, 31 Aug 2008 07:27:12 -0300, Wojtek Walczak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 06:40:35 GMT, OKB (not okblacke) wrote:
>
>>> Download the latest beta for your system and give it a try.
>>
>> Thanks for the advice, but I'd really rather not deal with
>> installing the e
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 06:40:35 GMT, OKB (not okblacke) wrote:
>> Download the latest beta for your system and give it a try.
>
> Thanks for the advice, but I'd really rather not deal with
> installing the entire thing alongside my existing version, possibly
> causing conflicts in who knows w
Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>> So, will relative imports in Python 3.0 allow things like
>> "import
>> ..relative.importing.path as prettyname"? If not, why not?
>
> Download the latest beta for your system and give it a try.
Thanks for the advice, but I'd really rathe
So, will relative imports in Python 3.0 allow things like "import
..relative.importing.path as prettyname"? If not, why not?
Download the latest beta for your system and give it a try.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I was looking at PEP 328. It says that relative imports with the
dot syntax will only be allowed with the "from" import variety (e.g.,
"from ..somemodule import somename"). The reason given for this in the
PEP is that after import xxx.yyy, "xxx.yyy" is usable in an expression,
but the