On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 2:37 PM Barry wrote:
> > On 5 Dec 2020, at 23:44, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-12-05 23:42:11 +0100, sjeik_ap...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >> Timeout: no idea. But check out re.compile and re.iterfind as they
> might
> >> speed things up.
> >
> > I doubt that com
> On 5 Dec 2020, at 23:44, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>
> On 2020-12-05 23:42:11 +0100, sjeik_ap...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> Timeout: no idea. But check out re.compile and re.iterfind as they might
>> speed things up.
>
> I doubt that compiling regular expressions helps the OP much. Compiled
> r
On 2020-12-05 23:42:11 +0100, sjeik_ap...@hotmail.com wrote:
>Timeout: no idea. But check out re.compile and re.iterfind as they might
>speed things up.
I doubt that compiling regular expressions helps the OP much. Compiled
regular expressions are cached, but more importantly, if a match t
Hi,
Timeout: no idea. But check out re.compile and re.iterfind as they might
speed things up. I often compile a regex once upon import, then use it in
functions
On 27 Nov 2020 13:33, Shahique Khan wrote:
Hi Team,
I have noticed if our regex sometimes does not give a resu
Hi Team,
I have noticed if our regex sometimes does not give a result and on that
time regex took more time in returning response (empty response).
My Question is can we set a timeout parameter (in seconds/millisecond) with
re.find or anywhere in code to avoid CPU consumption if regex takes more
