[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I guess you're right... I think its just cold feet from the possibility
> of getting involved and discovering specific gotchas later.
>
> What I'm hearing you tell me is *go and play it*.
uche posted an interesting taxonomy here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp
I guess you're right... I think its just cold feet from the possibility
of getting involved and discovering specific gotchas later.
What I'm hearing you tell me is *go and play it*.
Thanks for replying...
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
*SNIP Long list of possible criteria for chooseing an XML library*
Even with all your personal considerations, there is no one "correct"
answer for you. I can think of four or five packages that would meet
all your criteria.
You said something quite apt:
"This question is a bit like the ones pe
I'm asking help on this topic of building a tools foundation for future
XML projects because of the sheer volume of possibilities I will not
have the time to check/try/test in detail.
This question is a bit like the ones pertaining to 'Which web framework
to use?', there is a lot of good stuff out
