Sorry Nicolaas, I didn't mean to misspell your name!
Regards,
Howard
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sep 6, 5:32 pm, windandwaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone tell me why I should learn python? I am a webdeveloper,
> but I often see Python mentioned and I am curious to find out what I
> am missing out on.
>
> Thank you
>
> Nicolaas
Nicholaas,
There are many reasons to learn Pytho
On Sep 6, 10:51 pm, James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> > On Sep 6, 5:36 pm, André <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Easy to read, easy to write, good libraries and, I have found, an
> >> extremely helpful community.
>
> >> Hobbyists (like me) can work on projects w
On Sep 6, 9:20 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> En Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:34:10 -0300, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> escribi?:
>
> > On 2007-09-06, Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hallöchen!
>
> >> Tom Brown writes:
>
> >>> [...] Python has been by far the e
Tom Brown wrote:
> On Thursday 06 September 2007 15:44, Torsten Bronger wrote:
>> Hallöchen!
>>
>> Tom Brown writes:
>>> [...] Python has been by far the easiest to develop in. Some
>>> people might say it is not "real programming" because it is so
>>> easy.
>> I can't believe this. Have you real
I wholeheartedly second the recommendation of this article:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/3882
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
In a message dated 2007-9-7 7:50:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Brown wrote:
> On Thursday 06 September 2007 15:44, Torsten Bronger wrote:
>> Hallöchen!
>>
>> Tom Brown writes:
>> > [...] Python has been by far the easiest to develop in. Some
>> > people might say it is not "real progra
Why use Python?
1)Easy to read, debug and think.
2)Same language for batch scripting, server programming and dynamic
web page creation.
3)Libraries like wxPython for desktop and Cherrypy for web
development.
4)Pythonic JavaScript Library Mochikit.
5)Engineered for reality, not corporate proprietary
On 07/09/07, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 06 September 2007 16:01, windandwaves wrote:
> > Hmmm, thank you all for your replies. I will do some research on the
> > net (i did some already, but because I am really not much of a
> > programmer, it is often too detailed for me).
On Sep 6, 10:32 pm, windandwaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone tell me why I should learn python? I am a webdeveloper,
> but I often see Python mentioned and I am curious to find out what I
> am missing out on.
>
> Thank you
>
> Nicolaas
- You never really have to reinvent the wheel,
windandwaves a écrit :
> Can someone tell me why I should learn python?
Really, I cannot see any reason why you should do such a thing.
> I am a webdeveloper,
I've seen this label is applied to a wide range of effective jobs, from
"building static web pages with a WYSWIG editor not even knowin
TheFlyingDutchman a écrit :
> On Sep 6, 4:01 pm, windandwaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(snip)
>> but because I am really not much of a
>> programmer, it is often too detailed for me). I have limited time,
>> but it does sound like something to learn, just for fun and for
>> practical use. How w
Tom Brown a écrit :
> On Thursday 06 September 2007 16:01, windandwaves wrote:
>> Hmmm, thank you all for your replies. I will do some research on the
>> net (i did some already, but because I am really not much of a
>> programmer, it is often too detailed for me). I have limited time,
>> but it
BartlebyScrivener wrote:
> On Sep 6, 5:36 pm, André <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Easy to read, easy to write, good libraries and, I have found, an
>> extremely helpful community.
>>
>> Hobbyists (like me) can work on projects written in Python on and off
>> (sometimes for weeks if not months wi
En Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:34:10 -0300, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribi�:
> On 2007-09-06, Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hallöchen!
>>
>> Tom Brown writes:
>>
>>> [...] Python has been by far the easiest to develop in. Some
>>> people might say it is not "real programming"
On Sep 6, 5:36 pm, André <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Easy to read, easy to write, good libraries and, I have found, an
> extremely helpful community.
>
> Hobbyists (like me) can work on projects written in Python on and off
> (sometimes for weeks if not months without programming) and be able to
Torsten Bronger wrote:
Hallöchen!
Tom Brown writes:
[...] Python has been by far the easiest to develop in. Some
people might say it is not "real programming" because it is so
easy.
I can't believe this. Have you really heard such a statement?
Tschö,
Torsten.
The catch-phrase s
On 2007-09-06, Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallöchen!
>
> Tom Brown writes:
>
>> [...] Python has been by far the easiest to develop in. Some
>> people might say it is not "real programming" because it is so
>> easy.
>
> I can't believe this. Have you really heard such a statemen
Torsten Bronger wrote:
> Hallöchen!
>
> Tom Brown writes:
>
>> [...] Python has been by far the easiest to develop in. Some
>> people might say it is not "real programming" because it is so
>> easy.
>
> I can't believe this. Have you really heard such a statement?
>
> Tschö,
> Torsten.
>
Lo
On 2007-09-06, André <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 6, 7:29 pm, windandwaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sep 7, 9:50 am, James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > Seewww.python.org. Trust us all when we say that its the best.
>>
>> I get that feeling - yes. Question is:
>>
>> 1. wh
On 2007-09-06, windandwaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 7, 9:50 am, James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Seewww.python.org. Trust us all when we say that its the best.
>>
>
> I get that feeling - yes. Question is:
>
> 1. what is it good for?
Writing programs.
> 2. why is it so good
windandwaves wrote:
> Can someone tell me why I should learn python? I am a webdeveloper,
> but I often see Python mentioned and I am curious to find out what I
> am missing out on.
>
> Thank you
>
> Nicolaas
>
The last edition of The Python Papers (volume 2 issue 2,
http://archive.pythonpape
On Sep 6, 4:01 pm, windandwaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 7, 10:44 am, Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hallöchen!
>
> > Tom Brown writes:
> > > [...] Python has been by far the easiest to develop in. Some
> > > people might say it is not "real programming" because
On Thursday 06 September 2007 16:01, windandwaves wrote:
> Hmmm, thank you all for your replies. I will do some research on the
> net (i did some already, but because I am really not much of a
> programmer, it is often too detailed for me). I have limited time,
> but it does sound like something
On Sep 7, 10:44 am, Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hallöchen!
>
> Tom Brown writes:
> > [...] Python has been by far the easiest to develop in. Some
> > people might say it is not "real programming" because it is so
> > easy.
>
> I can't believe this. Have you really heard such a st
On Thursday 06 September 2007 15:44, Torsten Bronger wrote:
> Hallöchen!
>
> Tom Brown writes:
> > [...] Python has been by far the easiest to develop in. Some
> > people might say it is not "real programming" because it is so
> > easy.
>
> I can't believe this. Have you really heard such a state
Hallöchen!
Tom Brown writes:
> [...] Python has been by far the easiest to develop in. Some
> people might say it is not "real programming" because it is so
> easy.
I can't believe this. Have you really heard such a statement?
Tschö,
Torsten.
--
Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus
Hallöchen!
windandwaves writes:
> On Sep 7, 9:50 am, James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Seewww.python.org. Trust us all when we say that its the best.
>>
>
> I get that feeling - yes. Question is:
>
> 1. what is it good for?
> 2. why is it so good?
Your questions are very general. I th
On Sep 6, 7:29 pm, windandwaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 7, 9:50 am, James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Seewww.python.org. Trust us all when we say that its the best.
>
> I get that feeling - yes. Question is:
>
> 1. what is it good for?
Pretty much any programming task, exc
On Thursday 06 September 2007 15:29, windandwaves wrote:
> On Sep 7, 9:50 am, James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Seewww.python.org. Trust us all when we say that its the best.
>
> I get that feeling - yes. Question is:
>
> 1. what is it good for?
> 2. why is it so good?
>
> I would love t
On Thursday 06 September 2007 14:32, windandwaves wrote:
> Can someone tell me why I should learn python? I am a webdeveloper,
> but I often see Python mentioned and I am curious to find out what I
> am missing out on.
Ease of develpment. I write everything I can in python. If I can't do it in
p
On Sep 7, 9:50 am, James Stroud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seewww.python.org. Trust us all when we say that its the best.
>
I get that feeling - yes. Question is:
1. what is it good for?
2. why is it so good?
I would love to hear some opinions.
Cheers
Nicolaas
--
http://mail.python.org/ma
On Sep 6, 2:32 pm, windandwaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone tell me why I should learn python? I am a webdeveloper,
> but I often see Python mentioned and I am curious to find out what I
> am missing out on.
The reason I use Python is because I get more done quicker with fewer
bugs.
See www.python.org. Trust us all when we say that its the best.
windandwaves wrote:
> Can someone tell me why I should learn python? I am a webdeveloper,
> but I often see Python mentioned and I am curious to find out what I
> am missing out on.
>
> Thank you
>
> Nicolaas
>
--
James Stroud
34 matches
Mail list logo
