On 20 Apr 2018 8:39 am, "Chris Angelico" wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Francesco Russo
wrote:
> On 18/04/18 20:26, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> This is a bad idea. Each function that starts test_ should be
>> completely independent. You should be able to run any one of them on
>> its own (
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Francesco Russo wrote:
> On 18/04/18 20:26, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> This is a bad idea. Each function that starts test_ should be
>> completely independent. You should be able to run any one of them on
>> its own (say, if you're trying to figure out why your lates
On 18/04/18 20:26, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 2:51 AM, Francesco Russo
> wrote:
>> My use case: my SUT is split into modules. Besides writing unit tests for
>> each module, I want to write an integration test, and I also need to
>> perform some actions between two calls to th
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 2:51 AM, Francesco Russo wrote:
> My use case: my SUT is split into modules. Besides writing unit tests for
> each module, I want to write an integration test, and I also need to
> perform some actions between two calls to the SUT. In my case, the order of
> the execution i
