On 5/19/23 08:42, Benjamin Schollnick wrote:
*Top-posting? Really?
In that case, yes, because the conversion did not depend on what was
originally said. Unlike this conversation.
Actually, a very cursory look through the intarweb would have yielded
this -
And that’s the point, if you
> *Top-posting? Really?
In that case, yes, because the conversion did not depend on what was originally
said. Unlike this conversation.
> Actually, a very cursory look through the intarweb would have yielded this -
And that’s the point, if you want to me to consider your package, I should hav
On 5/19/23 06:41, Benjamin Schollnick wrote:
Meejah, > > Sorry, but, would you please consider adding a short description
to this of what txtorcon is. > It’s great that your announcing the
update, and highlighting the changes…if I used it, I’d be upgrading it.
> > But I have absolutely no ide
Meejah,
Sorry, but, would you please consider adding a short description to this of
what txtorcon is.
It’s great that your announcing the update, and highlighting the changes…if I
used it, I’d be upgrading it.
But I have absolutely no idea why I would want to investigate using it, because
ther
