In article ,
anon hung wrote:
> >> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
> >> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent
> >> in python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears
> >> thing..
> >>
> >> First of all, is it still
>>> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
>>> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent in
>>> python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears thing..
>>>
>>> First of all, is it still alive? Looks like turbogears 2 is the most
>> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
>> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent
>> in python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears
>> thing..
>>
>> First of all, is it still alive? Looks like turbogears 2 is the most
>
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:33:55 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article ,
> anon hung wrote:
>
>> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
>> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent in
>> python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears th
In article ,
anon hung wrote:
> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent
> in python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears
> thing..
>
> First of all, is it still alive? Looks lik
