Re: timeout calling local sendmail

2006-08-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That seems applicable to writing an SMTP server/daemon, but is it necessary for a script client calling a local SendMail daemon? Tim Williams wrote: > > > RFC 1123 > > http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/RFC/1123/109.htm > > I find that a timeout of 120 seconds is the bare minimum. If the > timeout is

Re: timeout calling local sendmail

2006-08-09 Thread Tim Williams
On 9 Aug 2006 08:22:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that's > "timeout calling local sendmail" > not > "timeout calling local se" > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > (Environment: RedHat Linux recent, Python 2.3.5) > > > > We have a batch processing script that on occasion n

Re: timeout calling local sendmail

2006-08-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that's "timeout calling local sendmail" not "timeout calling local se" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > (Environment: RedHat Linux recent, Python 2.3.5) > > We have a batch processing script that on occasion needs to send out an > email. We have a sendmail running locally. > > Sometimes we get a socke