>
> Se we need to know a bit more about your 4.5-hour program before we can
> determine whether threads can help. There is light at the end of the
> tunnel, however, since even if threads don't work it's possible that the
> multiprocessing module will (assuming you have multi-processor hardware
> a
alex goretoy wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Are you referring to the endless GIL debate? I googled about what you
> said. I'll look into it here shortly. I just know one thing, is that I
> need a comparison for regular code and something about how GIL and
> threading fit in the picture. It makes it easier fo
Steve,
Are you referring to the endless GIL debate? I googled about what you said.
I'll look into it here shortly. I just know one thing, is that I need a
comparison for regular code and something about how GIL and threading fit in
the picture. It makes it easier for me to understand what is going
alex goretoy wrote:
> I've found a great example on how to do threads. It compares a ping
> program in regular for loop and with threaded for loop. The link is
> below if anyone is interested.
>
> http://www.wellho.net/solutions/python-python-threads-a-first-example.html
>
> I hope my eagerness t
I've found a great example on how to do threads. It compares a ping program
in regular for loop and with threaded for loop. The link is below if anyone
is interested.
http://www.wellho.net/solutions/python-python-threads-a-first-example.html
I hope my eagerness to post doesn't annoy anyone. I lik
