Re: suckitude classifications [was Re: Keeping python code and database in sync]

2014-08-29 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > In article , > Chris Angelico wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Ethan Furman wrote: >> > Speaking of suckitude, we could classify technologies that way: >> > >> > xml: major suckitude >> > >> > rpc: no suckitude >> > >> > python: ne

Re: suckitude classifications [was Re: Keeping python code and database in sync]

2014-08-29 Thread Roy Smith
In article , Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Ethan Furman wrote: > > Speaking of suckitude, we could classify technologies that way: > > > > xml: major suckitude > > > > rpc: no suckitude > > > > python: negative suckitude > > I disagree with your last two qualificatio

Re: suckitude classifications [was Re: Keeping python code and database in sync]

2014-08-29 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Ethan Furman wrote: > Speaking of suckitude, we could classify technologies that way: > > xml: major suckitude > > rpc: no suckitude > > python: negative suckitude I disagree with your last two qualifications. RPC still sucks, just not as much as some things do. A