Marc Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem with the above is that the subprocess buffers all its output
> when used like this and, hence, this automation is not informing me of
> much :)
You may want to take a look at my asyncproc module. With it, you
can start subprocesses and let
Donn Cave wrote:
> If you want to use select(), don't use the fileobject
> functions. Use os.read() to read data from the pipe's file
> descriptor (p.stdout.fileno().) This is how you avoid the
> buffering.
Thankyou, this works perfectly. I figured it would be something simple.
Marc
--
http://m
Marc Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> import subprocess,select,sys
>
> speakers=[]
> lProc=[]
>
> for machine in ['box1','box2','box3']:
> p = subprocess.Popen( ('echo '+machine+';sleep 2;echo goodbye;sleep
> 2;echo cruel;sleep 2;echo world'), stdout=subprocess.PIPE,
> stderr=sub
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Marc Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to rewrite a PERL automation which started a "monitoring"
> application on many machines, via RSH, and then multiplexed their
> collective outputs to stdout.
>
> In production there are lots of these subprocess
