Re: structs

2009-02-04 Thread Mark Wooding
Keith Thompson writes: > "Gary Herron" writes: >> Python *is* object-oriented > > I disagree. Care to provide proof of that statement? AWOOGA! The article I'm following up to (together with at least one other) is a forgery, and the Followup-To header is set to comp.lang.c as part of an effort

Re: structs

2009-02-04 Thread Steve Holden
Keith Thompson wrote: > "Gary Herron" writes: >> Python *is* object-oriented > > I disagree. Care to provide proof of that statement? Disagree all you like. Just do it silently, please. regards Steve -- Steve Holden+1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC http://w

Re: structs

2009-02-04 Thread Keith Thompson
"Gary Herron" writes: > Python *is* object-oriented I disagree. Care to provide proof of that statement? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Re: structs

2009-02-04 Thread Keith Thompson
"Scott David Daniels" writes: > To avoid using epsilon, do something like: > if 1 + abs(x) != 1: An OK effort, but you're wrong. That's not how to do it at all. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list