On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:23 PM, John Machin wrote:
> On Mar 9, 3:15 pm, Jack Steven wrote:
>> Isn't string.Template suppose to be faster than calling replace multiple
>> times? That's what I thought until I benchmarked this code, where
>> string.Template ended up being 4 times slower.
>>
>> This
On Mar 9, 3:15 pm, Jack Steven wrote:
> Isn't string.Template suppose to be faster than calling replace multiple
> times? That's what I thought until I benchmarked this code, where
> string.Template ended up being 4 times slower.
>
> This doesn't make sense to me, since unlike when you are calling
