On 03/06/10 09:45, wongjoek...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yes, I saw this example also before. HOwever what I want is to call an
internal function which gets a reference of another internal function
as input and not calling an external program. Do you have any example
on that with subprocess module ?
Tha
On 5 mrt, 21:40, "Martin P. Hellwig"
wrote:
> On 03/05/10 20:09, wongjoek...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 5 mrt, 21:02, "Martin P. Hellwig"
> > wrote:
> >> On 03/05/10 19:45, wongjoek...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >>> On 5 mrt, 20:40, "Martin P. Hellwig"
> >>> wrote:
> On 03/05/10 19:21, wongjoek.
On 2010-03-05 14:09 PM, wongjoek...@yahoo.com wrote:
I can't use multiprocessing module since it comes only with python 2.6
and I am bound to python2.4.
It is available as a third party package for Python 2.4:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/multiprocessing
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believ
On 03/05/10 20:09, wongjoek...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 5 mrt, 21:02, "Martin P. Hellwig"
wrote:
On 03/05/10 19:45, wongjoek...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 5 mrt, 20:40, "Martin P. Hellwig"
wrote:
On 03/05/10 19:21, wongjoek...@yahoo.com wrote:
Any specific reason why threading.Thread or multiprocessin
You're really close. See inline comment below.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:21 AM, wongjoek...@yahoo.com
wrote:
>
> def c():
> print "function c"
>
> def f(a,b, d):
> # function I want to run in a new child process
> print a, b
> d()
>
> def g():
> pidID = os.fork()
> if pidID == 0
On 5 mrt, 21:02, "Martin P. Hellwig"
wrote:
> On 03/05/10 19:45, wongjoek...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 5 mrt, 20:40, "Martin P. Hellwig"
> > wrote:
> >> On 03/05/10 19:21, wongjoek...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >>
> >> Any specific reason why threading.Thread or multiprocessing is not
> >> suitable t
On 03/05/10 19:45, wongjoek...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 5 mrt, 20:40, "Martin P. Hellwig"
wrote:
On 03/05/10 19:21, wongjoek...@yahoo.com wrote:
Any specific reason why threading.Thread or multiprocessing is not
suitable to solve your problem?
--
mph
Because I got a memory leak in my function f()
On 5 mrt, 20:40, "Martin P. Hellwig"
wrote:
> On 03/05/10 19:21, wongjoek...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> Any specific reason why threading.Thread or multiprocessing is not
> suitable to solve your problem?
>
> --
> mph
Because I got a memory leak in my function f(). It uses scipy, numpy,
pylab, and I a
On 03/05/10 19:21, wongjoek...@yahoo.com wrote:
Any specific reason why threading.Thread or multiprocessing is not
suitable to solve your problem?
--
mph
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
